Who are the named plaintiffs (full names) in major civil suits alleging sexual assault against Donald Trump since 2016?

1. Why Carroll Became the Central Test Case and What Her Name Means for the Record

E. Jean Carroll is identified throughout the provided analyses as the named plaintiff in a high‑profile civil suit accusing Donald Trump of sexual assault and defamation. Carroll publicly accused Trump of assault in the mid‑1990s and filed civil claims beginning in 2019 that later produced a jury finding she was sexually abused and defamed, with an awarded damages judgment reported in the documents. The case underwent multiple filings and appellate activity and is repeatedly cited as a major civil suit against Trump in the materials, which makes Carroll the clearest, fully‑named plaintiff with both criminal‑adjacent and defamation litigation consequences in the public record encapsulated here ^{[1] [4]}.

2. Who “Katie Johnson” and “Jane Doe” Are in the Court Papers—and the Limits of the Record

The materials also identify a plaintiff who filed in 2016 under the pseudonym “Jane Doe,” later associated with the name Katie Johnson in docket entries for case number 5:16‑cv‑00797 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. That complaint is described in the sources as alleging repeated rape involving Trump and an associate named Jeffrey Epstein; however, the accessible summaries do not provide full public confirmation of the plaintiff’s real‑name identity in every filing, and secondary reporting indicates the suit was dropped. The court docket listings confirm a Katie Johnson entry, but the substantive public record on outcomes and supporting evidence is limited in the materials provided here ^{[5] [3] [2]}.

3. Other Accusers Mentioned Widely in Media Versus Named Plaintiffs in Suit Documents

The assembled analyses list many women who have publicly accused Trump of sexual misconduct—names include Kristin Anderson, Rachel Crooks, Jessica Drake, Jill Harth, Jessica Leeds, Natasha Stoynoff, Summer Zervos and others—but the provided case‑specific documents and summaries do not identify these individuals as named plaintiffs in major civil suits within this dataset. The materials distinctly separate public allegation lists from formal civil‑suit plaintiffs: the only fully named plaintiff with a documented, reported court judgment in these sources is E. Jean Carroll; Katie Johnson/Jane Doe appears as a docketed plaintiff but with limited publicized case resolution details in the supplied records ^{[6] [2] [1]}.

4. How Outcomes and Timing Differ Between the Named Cases in the Record

The Carroll litigation progressed to verdict and damages, with reporting in the provided materials noting a jury finding of liability and a multi‑million dollar award. That outcome anchors Carroll’s presence as a major civil plaintiff in the post‑2016 era. In contrast, the Johnson/Jane Doe filing dates to 2016 and is reflected primarily in docket summaries; analyses state the suit was later dropped and the publicly available filings are sparse. These contrasts matter: Carroll’s case generated substantive judicial findings and appellate entries, while the Johnson/Jane Doe matter, as represented here, shows the limits of public litigation records where pseudonyms, sealed filings, or voluntary dismissals constrain what is available for verification ^{[1] [2] [5] [3]}.

5. What the Record Omits and How to Interpret the Discrepancies

The provided dataset omits detailed court transcripts, complete complaint texts, and confirmation of whether every publicly accused woman pursued civil litigation; it therefore cannot support a comprehensive list beyond the names above. The materials show agenda‑driven differences in coverage: media lists of accusers often aim to summarize allegations broadly, while court dockets and legal databases focus on formally filed plaintiffs and procedural posture. Where pseudonyms appear, the record may mask identities for privacy or legal strategy, and some filings noted in docket services require subscription access to view full content—limiting transparent verification in these sources alone ^{[3] [2] [6]}.

6. Bottom Line: Who Are the Named Plaintiffs in These Materials

Based on the documents and analyses provided, the major civil plaintiffs identified by name are E. Jean Carroll and a plaintiff filed as Katie Johnson (initially using the pseudonym “Jane Doe” in 2016). Other individuals are widely reported as accusers, but the supplied materials do not present them as named plaintiffs in major civil suits within this docketed evidence. For a comprehensive, court‑verified roster beyond these two names, primary court filings, unredacted dockets, and follow‑up reporting would be required to supplement the limits of the sources cited here ^{[1] [2] [3] [6]}.