Fact check: What did the New York Court of Appeals rule regarding Trump’s conviction or related cases in 2024 or 2025?

1. What the recent appeals filings actually say — the headline from October 2025 that matters

The most recent filings in the dataset show a formal appeal lodged by Donald Trump’s attorneys on October 28, 2025, arguing that the conviction should be overturned on grounds including allegedly faulty evidence and judicial bias, and characterizing the prosecution as highly politicized ^[1]. That filing frames the appeal as seeking vacatur of the verdict at the state appellate level and also references concurrent attempts to shift the litigation into federal court, indicating a two-track procedural strategy intended to contest both the merits and the proper forum for review ^[2]. The documents in these reports present appellate arguments and rhetoric typical of post-conviction briefs, but they do not report a decision by New York’s highest court.

2. What the public court records from 2024 show — trial-court texture without a Court of Appeals finale

The collection of court documents dated March 15, 2024, from the New York courts repository contains decisions, orders, and filings at the trial court level that map the procedural history and rulings by Judge Merchan and related docket activity, but the dataset explicitly lacks any notation that the New York Court of Appeals issued a substantive ruling on the conviction during 2024 or 2025 ^[3]. These materials are consistent with a case that underwent trial-level adjudication and subsequent post-trial motions and filings; they provide the procedural foundation for an appeal but stop short of showing a final determination by the state’s court of last resort. The presence of detailed lower-court records underscores that appellate review was a predictable next step, but not that it had produced a published outcome.

3. Comparing the news reports — media accounts record filings, not a ruling

Two contemporaneous news-style summaries in the dataset both cover the October 28, 2025 appeal and emphasize the legal grounds urged by Trump’s lawyers—faulty evidence, perceived judicial bias, and assertions the indictment was politically motivated—while also noting efforts to move aspects of the dispute into federal courts ^{[1] [2]}. Both pieces treat the appeal as an active procedural move and neither claims the New York Court of Appeals has ruled. The similarity across these accounts reinforces that, within this body of sources, the public narrative in late October 2025 centered on the launch of appellate litigation rather than on a concluded state-high-court opinion.

4. Where the reporting and records leave open questions — what is missing and why it matters

Because the supplied materials contain no explicit Court of Appeals decision for 2024 or 2025, the dataset cannot support a claim that the New York Court of Appeals resolved Trump’s conviction during that period ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Absent such a record, key questions remain unanswered here: whether an intermediate appellate court acted first, whether briefs are pending, or whether the Court of Appeals has declined review. Those procedural possibilities would materially change the status of the conviction, but the available items do not document them, so the only defensible factual statement based on this dataset is that an appeal was filed and lower-court records exist, not that a state-high-court ruling occurred.

5. Bottom line — a cautious, evidence-based answer drawn from the provided sources

The correct, evidence-based conclusion from the supplied analyses is direct: there is no evidence in these sources that the New York Court of Appeals issued any ruling on Donald Trump’s conviction in 2024 or 2025; instead, they show an appeal was filed on October 28, 2025, and that trial-court records from 2024 exist ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Any statement asserting a Court of Appeals decision during those years would go beyond what these materials substantiate.