Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How do New York Penal Law statutes define falsifying business records and classify degrees?
Executive summary
New York law defines falsifying business records in two degrees: second degree is a misdemeanor and first degree is an elevated felony when additional criminal intent is present (second-degree elements plus intent to commit, aid or conceal another crime) [1] [2]. First-degree falsifying business records is a class E felony; second-degree falsifying business records is a class A misdemeanor under Article 175 of the Penal Law [1] [3].
1. What the statutes say in plain language
The statute for falsifying business records in the second degree lists the basic acts that constitute the offense—making or causing a false entry in a business record, altering or deleting a true entry, omitting a required true entry, or preventing a true entry from being made—committed “with intent to defraud” [1]. The statute for first-degree falsifying business records makes the crime a felony when the defendant commits the second-degree act and, in addition, intends to commit another crime or to aid or conceal that other crime [2] [3].
2. How the law classifies the degrees and penalties
Under New York’s Penal Law, falsifying business records in the second degree is categorized as a class A misdemeanor, while falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony [1] [3]. Multiple legal reference sites and annotated statutes repeat that first degree is an E felony [4] [5], and practice-oriented materials explain prosecutors commonly “bump up” misdemeanor conduct to the felony when the necessary additional intent can be tied to another crime [6] [7].
3. The critical difference: intent and “another crime”
The statutory pivot between misdemeanor and felony is not merely the falsifying act itself but the defendant’s intent: if the intent to defraud includes an intent to commit a separate crime, or to aid or conceal it, the offense is escalated to first degree [2] [3]. Defense-oriented materials and court instruction forms emphasize that prosecutors must prove that additional criminal intent beyond falsification exists [8] [9].
4. Common prosecutorial strategy and practical effects
White‑collar practitioners and commentators note it is routine for prosecutors to charge potential related crimes (e.g., larceny, forgery) alongside falsifying-business-records counts to satisfy the “intent to commit or conceal” element and to increase leverage in plea negotiations [7] [6]. A survey of past prosecutions highlights that first‑degree falsifying-business-records prosecutions figure prominently in high‑profile indictments, signaling the practical importance of the felony elevation [10].
5. Defenses and statutory affirmative defense
New York law provides an affirmative defense in certain circumstances: an employee who, without personal benefit, merely followed orders of an employer or supervisor generally authorized to direct their activities can invoke that defense [7] [11]. Court instruction materials also set out how juries should treat that defense and the prosecution’s burden to prove intent [9] [8].
6. Where reporting and commentary converge — and where they differ
Statutory texts and legal reference sites converge on the elements and the class designations: second degree = class A misdemeanor; first degree = class E felony when coupled with intent to further/cover another crime [1] [3] [5]. Commentary differs in emphasis: defense‑oriented sources stress practical tactics to avoid felony exposure, while prosecutorial surveys underscore how often prosecutors seek the felony in complex cases [7] [10].
7. Limitations of available sources and what they do not address
Available sources set out elements and classification but do not provide exhaustive sentencing ranges for each class in statute excerpts provided here; some practitioner pages discuss possible penalties (e.g., general notes about felony exposure) but exact statutory sentencing tables or jurisdictional variances are not detailed in the cited materials [12] [6]. Also, available reporting here does not include case‑law analysis resolving borderline fact patterns or appellate gloss on “intent to defraud” beyond general instruction forms [8] [9].
8. Bottom line for readers and practitioners
If the falsifying act stands alone, the offense is typically prosecuted as falsifying business records in the second degree (a class A misdemeanor); if prosecutors can tie the falsification to an intent to commit, aid, or conceal another crime, they will seek first‑degree falsifying business records, a class E felony — a routinely used escalation in New York white‑collar practice [1] [2] [10]. Readers should consult statute text and local counsel for how these elements and defenses apply to specific factual scenarios [3] [7].