Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Which law enforcement agencies were involved in the investigation of Nick Fuentez?
Executive Summary
Multiple contemporary reports say the probe around incidents involving Nick Fuentes engaged local and state law enforcement, with the Berwyn Police Department repeatedly identified and the Illinois State Police mentioned in connection to the death of an alleged attacker; the FBI is also reported to have conducted a separate, months-long inquiry. These findings come from several news summaries with varying detail and focus, producing overlapping claims but notable omissions about other agencies or exact investigative roles [1] [2] [3].
1. What the reporting actually claims about local policing — the Berwyn thread that recurs
Contemporary reporting consistently ties the Berwyn Police Department to events connected to Nick Fuentes, describing Berwyn officers as the ones who responded to altercations at or near Fuentes’s residence and who were involved in the shooting of an armed man, John Lyons, during a foot chase after Lyons allegedly fired at police. The Berwyn involvement appears central to the immediate incident reporting and court filings referenced, making them the clearest local agency on record in these accounts [1] [2]. Berwyn Police is therefore the most repeatedly cited local law enforcement actor.
2. State-level involvement — Illinois State Police named in death inquiry
Reporting identifies the Illinois State Police as playing a distinct role, specifically in the investigation into the death of the alleged attacker linked to the Berwyn shooting. This suggests a typical division of responsibilities where state investigators take lead on officer-involved shootings or in-custody deaths that require independent review. The Illinois State Police’s involvement is reported in tandem with Berwyn’s response, indicating a layered local-state investigation structure rather than exclusive local control [1].
3. Federal interest — the FBI’s separate months-long review
At least one source reports that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) spent several months investigating Nick Fuentes, ultimately without charging him. That federal probe is described separately from the Berwyn and Illinois State Police incidents and appears to have focused on different allegations or national-security-adjacent concerns tied to Fuentes’s public activities. The existence of an FBI inquiry implies federal-level interest distinct from local incident responses, though the reporting notes the FBI did not file charges following its review [3].
4. Other local agencies and the Mahomet connection — partial attribution
Some reporting mentions a Mahomet, Illinois police investigation into a separate fatal shooting of three family members earlier the same day and connects the suspect, John Lyons, to one of those victims. These details position Mahomet police as investigating a different crime that became relevant to the broader narrative because of purported links between Lyons and victims, but that coverage does not clearly say Mahomet coordinated directly with Berwyn or state police on the Fuentes‑related events. The reporting treats Mahomet as the investigating agency for the earlier homicides rather than the Berwyn shooting [1].
5. Gaps, inconsistencies and what investigators did not report
Available summaries show important omissions: none of the cited analyses fully maps interagency communications, delineates who led which investigative threads, or lists other possible participants such as federal prosecutors, county sheriffs, or local prosecutors. Several pieces provide names and outcomes — like Lyons’s death or FBI non‑charges — but stop short of a comprehensive agency roster. The absence of these details leaves open whether other units, such as county or federal task forces, had operational roles or were conducting parallel reviews [1] [2] [3].
6. How timing and publication dates shape the record
The items in the record come from late 2024 through 2025 and reflect follow‑up reporting: a December 20, 2024 account ties Berwyn and Illinois State Police to the shootings and to Mahomet’s earlier probe, a January 16, 2025 piece reiterates Berwyn’s involvement and the shooting outside Fuentes’s home, and September 2025 reporting documents an FBI review that produced no charges. This chronology suggests immediate local/state reporting followed by later federal review reporting, which helps explain why different sources emphasize different agencies at different times [1] [2] [3].
7. Motives, editorial focus and what that means for readers
The coverage shows divergent emphases: local outlets or police‑incident summaries center Berwyn and Illinois State Police, while broader national profiles raise the FBI’s role in separate, longer-term inquiries into Fuentes. These patterns reflect editorial choices — local reporting prioritizes immediate actors, national reporting tracks federal probes — and indicate possible agendas to foreground either the violent incident or Fuentes’s national activities. Readers should note that each outlet’s focus shapes which agencies are highlighted and which are omitted [1] [2] [3].
8. Bottom line — who was involved, based on the available record
On the basis of the compiled reporting, the investigation related to incidents involving Nick Fuentes included the Berwyn Police Department as the primary local responder, the Illinois State Police in a state‑level investigatory role concerning the death of the alleged attacker, and the FBI in a separate, months‑long investigative review that resulted in no charges. Other local agencies, such as Mahomet police, are tied to related killings involving the suspect but are not described as leading the Fuentes‑adjacent police response; significant information gaps remain about coordination among these agencies [1] [2] [3].