What evidence has been made public about Nick Reiner’s psychiatric evaluations and medication timeline?

1. What the press reports as established: a prior schizophrenia diagnosis

Multiple mainstream outlets, citing unnamed sources with direct knowledge of the investigation, report that Reiner was diagnosed with schizophrenia years before the murders and was under treatment at the time of the incident; NBC News, the Los Angeles Times and KNBC are among those that have reported this diagnosis based on those sources ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

2. What the press reports about medication changes or adjustments

Several outlets say Reiner’s medication regimen was “changed” or “adjusted” before the killings — language repeated in NBC, USA Today, MedPage Today and other summaries — but those reports rely on anonymous sources and do not identify the drug class or the precise timing beyond phrases such as “some time before” or “shortly before” the deaths ^{[1] [3] [5] [6]}.

3. More specific—but unconfirmed—timelines circulated by tabloids

Tabloid and entertainment outlets (TMZ and reporting that repeats its claims) assert a narrower window, alleging medications were altered three to four weeks before the murders and that behavior grew “erratic” afterward; those timelines originate from the outlets’ unpublished sources and have not been corroborated by public medical records or official filings ^{[7] [8]}.

4. The sealed court order and the limits it imposes on public knowledge

A judge signed a sealed medical order early in the prosecution’s proceedings, and reporting indicates the order may relate to Reiner’s mental-health treatment; news organizations confirm the order exists but the contents remain confidential to the public, meaning court-controlled material that could clarify evaluations and prescriptions is not available for independent review ^{[9] [1]}.

5. What has not been made public: drugs, dates, evaluation content and clinical notes

No outlet has produced verifiable medical records, clinicians’ notes, psychiatric evaluation reports, prescription names, dosing schedules or formal competency or sanity examination results; major reports explicitly note the name of the drug and the exact timeline of prescriptions or adjustments are “not known” or have not been released ^{[3] [6] [10]}.

6. How commentators and clinicians frame the partial record

Psychiatrists and specialty outlets observing the reporting stress that medication adjustments are routine in treating psychotic disorders and can carry risks if abrupt, but they also warn against simplistic causal claims linking a medication change alone to homicidal behavior; Psychiatric Times and other commentaries underline the lack of public clinical detail and urge caution in inferring mechanism from incomplete reporting ^{[4] [11] [6]}.

7. How the limited evidence is likely to be used in court narratives

Defense strategists, as reported in outlets summarizing courtroom strategy, may lean on the diagnosis and alleged medication adjustment to support an insanity or diminished-capacity defense, while prosecutors have so far not publicly released mental-health records and have indicated decisions such as whether to seek capital punishment will be considered over months; those procedural points are already part of the public record ^{[10] [12]}.

8. Bottom line: credible leads, substantial evidentiary gaps

The publicly available evidence consists of consistent press accounts—rooted in anonymous sources and a sealed court order—that Reiner had a history of schizophrenia and that medication was adjusted before the killings, but there is no publicly released medical documentation, timeline with dates, drug names, or formal psychiatric evaluation reports to substantiate causal claims; the sealed order and reliance on unnamed sources mean key facts remain inaccessible ^{[1] [2] [9]}.