Norm has broken the law in so many ways abuse of power etc what are they

1. Allegations of sexual harassment and assault: what reporters and colleagues said

Multiple outlets and social posts catalog accounts from women in comedy who described feeling harassed or sexually demeaned by Macdonald, and some reporting collected contemporaneous claims that he’d behaved inappropriately toward female colleagues and venue staff; those accusations surfaced publicly after his death and in social media threads and journalism pieces ^{[1] [2] [4] [5]}.

2. Industry responses and venue measures

Comedy clubs and bookers reportedly took steps to avoid situations they regarded as risky: some venues barred him from certain bookings, and one club implemented green‑room policies about who could serve or assist him when he performed, according to reporting that traced how venues reacted to complaints from staff and performers ^[1].

3. High‑profile comments, cancellations and public fallout

Macdonald’s remarks in a 2018 interview — expressing relief that the #MeToo reckoning had “slowed down” and appearing to defend accused entertainers like Louis C.K. and Roseanne Barr — generated significant backlash, led to the cancellation of a Tonight Show appearance, and produced public apologies and media coverage criticizing the comments as out of step with broader cultural shifts ^{[6] [7] [3]}.

4. Specific contested incidents and disputed claims

At least one former SNL colleague, Chris Kattan, publicly leveled severe allegations in a radio interview that included claims of sexual and physical abuse against an assistant, which were reported and re‑reported by outlets ^[8]. Other comedians and commenters shared stories on social media alleging harassment; these items amplified the narrative but also include second‑hand accounts and vary in detail and corroboration ^{[2] [4] [5]}.

5. Offensive remarks toward marginalized groups and subsequent responses

Reporting documents moments when Macdonald made transphobic or ableist comments — for example, a remark on Howard Stern that was widely criticized as invoking Down syndrome in a way that many found offensive — further fueling controversy and prompting apologies and media condemnation ^{[3] [9] [7]}.

6. Patterns, plausible explanations and competing narratives

Some pieces emphasize a pattern of behavior and industry attempts to manage it, while others stress Macdonald’s comedic persona, misstatements taken out of context, or his own claims that remarks were misconstrued and that he never “did anything” criminal ^{[9] [10]}. Journalists and commentators note his frequent provocations, uneven truth‑telling about his life and anecdotes, and the difficulty of disentangling joke‑driven persona from reprehensible conduct ^{[1] [6]}.

7. Legal record and limits of the reporting

The assembled reporting concentrates on allegations, venue policies, canceled bookings, social‑media revelations and public controversy; the sources provided do not document criminal charges or convictions tied to these allegations, and they do not present the kind of court records or indictments that would prove legal guilt beyond accusations ^{[1] [2] [4]}. If there are formal legal actions or police reports, they are not contained in the provided material and therefore cannot be affirmed here.

8. Why coverage diverges and where agendas may steer the story

Tabloid threads, opinion pieces, legacy obituaries and social posts each carry different incentives: tabloids amplify salacious details, opinion writers frame legacy debates around comedy and accountability, and social media can both surface unreported complaints and conflate rumor with fact; readers should note those differing agendas when assessing what “breaking the law” versus “misconduct” means in the record about Macdonald ^{[5] [1] [2]}.