Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are notable historical cases of naturalized citizens deported by ICE?
Executive summary
Reporting and watchdog analyses show multiple documented incidents since 2015 in which people identified as U.S. citizens — including naturalized or derivative citizens — were arrested, detained, or in some cases deported by immigration authorities; the American Immigration Council cites government data saying as many as 70 people “deported” in a reviewed period and ICE records are thin on citizen-error tracking [1]. High‑profile, recent cases include a man claimed to be a U.S. citizen who attorneys say was deported to Laos despite a federal judge blocking his removal [2] [3], while DHS publicly insists ICE “does NOT arrest or deport U.S. citizens,” calling some reporting false [4].
1. “Numbers, watchdogs, and what’s measurable”
A Government Accountability Office–based tally highlighted by the American Immigration Council found ICE arrested 674 potential U.S. citizens, detained 121, and deported 70 during the period the watchdog analyzed, with researchers warning that ICE and CBP keep poor records that make error rates hard to pin down [1]. ICE’s own public statistics pages break down arrests and detentions by country of citizenship and criminal history but do not reliably enumerate misidentifications of citizenship; available sources call out inconsistent training and recordkeeping as contributors to mistaken actions [5] [1].
2. “High‑profile legal fight: the Laos removal”
Attorneys and multiple news outlets reported that Chanthila Souvannarath — who claims derivative U.S. citizenship through his father — was deported to Laos even after a federal judge issued an order blocking his removal while he pursued his citizenship claim; civil liberties groups called the removal a “stunning violation” of the court order [2] [3]. The Independent and The Guardian coverage emphasize that Souvannarath’s case raises urgent questions about whether other people with plausible citizenship claims have been wrongfully expelled [2] [3].
3. “Patterns beyond one case: detained citizens and community fear”
ProPublica and other reporting compiled by commentators show hundreds of incidents in which people later identified as citizens were detained during immigration enforcement actions; one outlet summarized about 170 detentions during targeted operations, and community reporting indicates people of color and certain immigrant communities have felt compelled to carry passports domestically out of fear [6] [7]. Lawmakers and advocates have pointed to instances of naturalized citizens and U.S.-born children being swept up during routine check‑ins and enforcement actions, creating a climate of fear that extends beyond litigated cases [7] [8].
4. “Official pushback: DHS’s categorical denial”
The Department of Homeland Security publicly published a rebuttal denying that ICE arrests or deports U.S. citizens and labeled some press accounts “false and misleading,” asserting ICE does due diligence and does not arrest citizens [4]. That statement directly conflicts with reporting and watchdog findings cited above, illustrating a sharp factual dispute between federal officials and investigative journalism/advocacy groups [4] [1] [2].
5. “Why mistakes happen, according to reports”
Analyses point to institutional drivers: inconsistent training materials, incomplete or fragmented databases between ICE and CBP, and enforcement pressure that prioritizes rapid arrests — all of which create conditions for misidentification of citizenship status, according to the GAO findings and the American Immigration Council synthesis [1] [5]. Local 287(g) partnerships and other cooperative programs add complexity to how identity checks are performed across jurisdictions [9].
6. “Competing narratives and how to weigh them”
Advocates, civil rights groups, and investigative outlets present documented detentions and litigated deportations as evidence of systemic failures and racialized enforcement [1] [6]. DHS’s denial frames such incidents as isolated reporting errors or mischaracterizations and stresses procedural safeguards [4]. Readers should note that the watchdog analysis finds concrete cases of deportation and detention of people later identified as citizens, while DHS maintains the official policy position that ICE does not deport citizens — the two positions are in direct conflict in available reporting [1] [4].
7. “What remains unclear and where reporting is thin”
Available sources document specific cases and broader tallies but also emphasize gaps: ICE and CBP recordkeeping deficiencies mean the true scale of citizen wrongful detention or deportation cannot be precisely measured from available public data [1]. Sources do not provide a comprehensive, up‑to‑date list of every naturalized citizen ever deported by ICE; therefore, a definitive catalog is not available in current reporting [1].
8. “Practical takeaways and policy responses”
Advocates and some lawmakers have pushed legislation and oversight measures to prevent mistaken arrests and removals and to require better recordkeeping and accountability; congressional staffers and members have introduced proposals to curb ICE actions against people asserting U.S. citizenship [8]. At the same time, DHS’s categorical denials complicate oversight — a robust accounting will depend on independent review, improved agency data, and court outcomes in contested cases [4] [1].