Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are notable cases of ICE deporting U.S. citizens and when did they occur?
Executive summary
A series of investigations and reports show that U.S. citizens have been detained and, in some cases, deported by U.S. immigration authorities across multiple years, with documented incidents ranging from high‑profile wrongful removals in the 1990s–2000s to hundreds of recent detentions identified by journalists and advocacy groups; systemic recordkeeping failures, racial profiling and procedural gaps are repeatedly cited as drivers. Contemporary reporting counts over 170 Americans detained by immigration agents in recent years and federal reviews previously identified dozens of possible citizen removals, while individual cases such as Mark Lyttle, Pedro Guzman and more recent detainees illustrate how errors occur in practice [1] [2] [3].
1. Troubling tally: Journalists find 170-plus Americans held by immigration agents
A multi‑story investigative sweep published in October and November 2025 documents more than 170 U.S. citizens detained by immigration agents, often for days despite presenting identification and asserting citizenship; that investigation notes the government does not centrally track such incidents, implying the true number could be higher [1] [4]. The reporting includes named examples—an ICU nurse and an Army veteran—released without charge after detention and highlights allegations of racial profiling, physical mistreatment, and disregard for citizens’ identification. Journalists and civil‑rights advocates frame these incidents as part of an enforcement posture that allows agents wide discretion in operations, a claim supported by lawyers quoted who point to constitutional harms and the need for greater transparency [4] [1].
2. Historic wrongful deportations that became emblematic of system failures
Longstanding case law and high‑profile litigated cases show errors are not new: Mark Daniel Lyttle’s 2008 forcible removal to Mexico, despite U.S. citizenship and mental disability, is a benchmark example that resulted in a federal settlement; similarly, Pedro Guzman’s 2007 removal and other cases in the 1990s and 2000s demonstrate how detentions turned into deportations when detainees lacked counsel, coherent records, or were coerced into admitting foreign nationality [3] [5] [6]. Government accountability reviews have previously flagged that inadequate databases, inconsistent training, and faulty procedures contributed to erroneous removals and prolonged detention of citizens, with GAO and advocacy groups documenting systemic vulnerabilities [2] [3].
3. How the system fails: records, training and legal safeguards
Multiple sources converge on the same institutional weaknesses: ICE and CBP recordkeeping is incomplete, databases are error‑prone, front‑line training is inconsistent, and there is no reliable government tally of citizen detentions—conditions that create opportunities for wrongful detention or deportation to occur. Investigations and GAO reports link these failures to disproportionate impacts on people of color and non‑English speakers, and point to situations where agents proceeded with enforcement despite presented evidence of citizenship, underscoring procedural breakdowns from arrest through removal [2] [1] [5]. Legal experts in recent reporting argue these gaps raise constitutional concerns and increase litigation risk for the government [4] [7].
4. Recent litigation and controversies show differing narratives and agendas
Contemporary lawsuits filed by people alleging wrongful detention describe targeted enforcement against Latinos and other groups, while ICE and some officials deny purposeful targeting and emphasize operational exigencies; this contrast highlights competing agendas—advocates seeking accountability and critics stressing enforcement necessity. News accounts from 2025 present plaintiffs alleging repeated detentions despite ID and citizenship claims and document agency denials, illustrating a factual dispute over whether incidents reflect systemic bias or isolated errors [7] [4]. The investigative work that tallied 170+ detentions frames the issue as widespread and policy‑level, whereas government statements tend to characterize individual incidents as correctable mistakes [1] [7].
5. What the records and cases mean: scale, remedies and unresolved questions
Existing evidence establishes that citizen detentions and occasional wrongful deportations have occurred repeatedly across decades, with both old landmark cases and a recent surge in documented detentions demonstrating persistent vulnerabilities; however, the absence of a comprehensive federal tracking mechanism and disputes over motives and procedures leave the full scale uncertain [1] [2]. Remedies in past cases have included settlements and litigation victories for victims, while oversight recommendations call for better databases, training and transparent reporting; yet recent reporting suggests these reforms have been only partially implemented, so accountability and prevention remain open policy questions requiring legislative, administrative and judicial attention [3] [2].