How many people arrested in uk for online comments

Checked on January 11, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Official reporting and independent analyses converge on the same headline: roughly 12,000 arrests a year in recent years have been linked to online communications in the UK, equivalent to about 30–33 arrests per day based on custody data obtained by The Times and cited across parliamentary and media debate [1] [2] [3].

1. What the headline number is and where it comes from

The central figure repeatedly cited in 2024–2025 coverage is roughly 12,000 arrests in a year — The Times’ custody-data analysis put the 2023 total at 12,183 arrests, which has been rounded and reported as “about 12,000” and translated into “more than 30 arrests a day” or “33 a day” in subsequent commentary and parliamentary questions [2] [3] [1].

2. Legal framework behind the arrests

These arrests are recorded under communications offences such as section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 and section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988, statutes that criminalise sending grossly offensive or menacing electronic communications — the custody-data analysis that produced the 12,000 figure explicitly referenced those provisions [4] [2].

3. Geographic and per‑capita variation

Arrest patterns vary widely across forces: the Metropolitan Police recorded the highest absolute number with 1,709 arrests, followed by West Yorkshire and Thames Valley , while Leicestershire had the highest rate per 100,000 people (83 per 100,000) when figures were adjusted for population [4].

4. Context and trends: more arrests but fewer prosecutions and imprisonments

Analysts and civil‑liberties groups note a divergence between arrests and outcomes: while arrests rose (a cited 121% increase since the pre‑pandemic period in one review), prosecutions and imprisonments for these offences have fallen, leading critics to argue that many arrests lead to no conviction or custodial sentence [5] [4].

5. How the statistic has been used, misused and amplified

The “30 arrests a day” framing has been amplified by politicians and commentators as evidence of a free‑speech crackdown — it appears in parliamentary questions and was repeated by high‑profile figures and outlets — but some fact‑checkers and commentators warn that the raw figure can be misleading without context about the offences’ nature (threats, hate crimes, harassment, doxxing, etc.) and about the distinction between arrest, charge and conviction [1] [2] [6].

6. Contradictory reports and limitations of the data

Some follow‑up reporting cited different totals — a tabloid summary suggested arrests fell to 9,700 in a more recent year — and media outlets sometimes present the custody‑data number as proof of a broader “thought‑police” narrative, which overlooks legal nuance and variations between forces [7] [6]. The primary limitation is that the commonly cited figure derives from custody records compiled by journalists rather than an official consolidated national government dataset released explicitly as “arrests for online comments,” and parliamentary requests asked the government for estimates rather than supplying an independent central tally [1] [8].

7. Balanced verdict

The most robust, repeatedly cited number available in the reporting supplied is roughly 12,000 arrests in 2023 for offences linked to online communications — about 30–33 a day — but that figure requires multiple caveats: it covers a range of communications offences (not only innocuous “comments”), is uneven across police forces, and does not mean 12,000 convictions or imprisonments; indeed prosecutions and custodial sentences have trended down even as arrests rose [2] [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
How many of those arrested for online communications in the UK were subsequently charged, convicted, or imprisoned?
What specific behaviours (threats, harassment, incitement, hate speech) make up the bulk of arrests under sections 127 and 1 in recent years?
How do arrest rates for online communications in the UK compare with comparable European countries when adjusted for legal definitions and population?