How many Somalis have been convicted in MN

Checked on January 15, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Reporting on the Minnesota fraud and related prosecutions does not yield a single uncontested tally of “how many Somalis have been convicted in MN,” but contemporaneous federal and media reports place the number of convictions tied to the sprawling investigations in roughly the 57–64 range while noting that 85 of 98 people charged are of Somali descent, which is the clearest demographic figure available in the public record [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. What the major counts say and why they differ

Different outlets report different conviction totals because the investigations cover multiple indictments, plea deals, and rolling prosecutions over several years; a local explainer said 57 people had been convicted as of its reporting, reflecting an earlier snapshot [1], a fact-checking report summarized “at least 60” convictions [2], and a House Oversight release cited 64 convictions tied to the Minnesota fraud cases [3], so the immediate reality is a narrow but important spread in published counts tied to timing and case status [1] [2] [3].

2. The clearer constant: how many Somali defendants were charged

Although conviction totals vary, reporting is consistent that a large majority of those charged are Somali: multiple sources cite that of roughly 98 people charged in the federal probe, about 85 are of Somali descent—this demographic figure appears repeatedly in DOJ- and press-linked coverage and is the most stable statistic across the reporting [4] [5] [6].

3. Where “nearly 90 convicted” and other higher figures come from

Some outlets and summaries have used phrases like “nearly 90” convicted or “nearly 90 people have been convicted,” which likely reflect conflation between the number charged and the number convicted, or include separate, related prosecutions and state cases; NewsNation reported “nearly 90” convicted as a claim from unnamed federal sources, a count that conflicts with the 57–64 figures in other contemporaneous reporting and therefore highlights how fluid the totals have been in news cycles [7] [1] [2].

4. Broader historical context often cited by officials and agencies

Coverage also points to other convictions of Somalis in Minnesota on non-fraud crimes—DHS material has previously noted that “more than 20” Somali-Americans were convicted in U.S. District Court in Minnesota on terrorism-related charges in earlier years—showing that fraud prosecutions are not the only category invoked when tallying convictions involving Somali Minnesotans, but that number is separate from the recent fraud case totals [8].

5. Political framing, media disputes, and the impact on the numbers

The number of convictions has been weaponized in political messaging: House Republicans and federal officials have emphasized large totals and the Somali share of defendants in oversight hearings to argue for policy responses [3] [6], while some critics contend media coverage has either exaggerated or downplayed aspects of the story depending on outlet and agenda—conservative outlets stress the scale and Somali composition [9], mainstream outlets and analysts caution about statistical nuance and the risk of stigmatizing an entire community [10] [11].

Conclusion — the direct answer

Based on the provided reporting, the best-supported contemporaneous range for convictions tied to the Minnesota fraud prosecutions is roughly 57 to 64 people, and reporting consistently shows that the overwhelming majority of defendants charged in the principal federal probe—about 85 of 98—are of Somali descent; therefore, the number of convicted defendants who are Somali is reported in that same window by different outlets (57, “at least 60,” or 64) depending on timing and which subset of cases is counted [1] [2] [3] [4]. Exact current totals require confirmation from the U.S. Attorney’s Office or court records because reporting reflects different snapshots of an active, evolving series of prosecutions [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the U.S. Attorney’s official, up-to-date count of convictions in the Minnesota fraud prosecutions?
How many people were charged in the Feeding Our Future case and what portion were convicted vs. charged?
What public statements and evidence have been presented in House Oversight hearings about fraud in Minnesota social programs?