Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How many right-wing extremist groups are currently active in the USA?
Executive Summary
There is no single authoritative count of “active right-wing extremist groups” in the United States; major datasets and government reports use different definitions, categories, and collection methods, so published tallies range from several hundred to over a thousand depending on criteria. Recent work from civil-society trackers and government agencies agrees that right-wing violent extremism remains the predominant source of ideologically motivated lethal attacks since the 1990s, but they do not converge on a fixed number of active groups [1] [2] [3].
1. The headline claims — Why numbers diverge and what each source actually says
Public claims about group counts stem from differing missions and methodologies: civil-legal monitors like the Southern Poverty Law Center catalog “hate and antigovernment organizations” broadly, yielding a high figure — 1,371 groups in 2024 in the SPLC dataset — which mixes formal organizations, loose local chapters, and ideologically aligned networks; SPLC emphasizes outreach, infiltration of local politics, and online recruitment [2] [4]. Academic and security studies focus on violent incidents and plots rather than organizational rosters: the Center for Strategic and International Studies and an NIJ analysis highlight that right‑wing attackers account for most U.S. domestic terror incidents since 1994 but do not enumerate active groups [5] [1]. The FBI’s public domestic-terrorism assessments list threat categories and investigative caseloads (roughly 2,700 pending domestic-terror investigations in FY2022) without issuing a definitive group tally, reflecting operational sensitivities and classification challenges [3].
2. What civil-society tallies capture — breadth over precision
The SPLC’s 2024 “Year in Hate and Extremism” dataset intentionally casts a wide net, recording organized chapters, affiliated local groups, and movement networks, which inflates numeric counts relative to narrower law‑enforcement definitions. This approach surfaces trends useful for public policy and prevention — such as increases in Proud Boys chapters and anti-LGBTQ or anti-immigrant organizing — but it also conflates nonviolent advocacy groups with violent cells when both belong to the same ideological ecosystem. The SPLC frames its figures as an early‑warning tool to track normalization and political influence rather than a law‑enforcement inventory of violent actors, which explains why its totals differ markedly from government investigative metrics [2] [6].
3. What government reports track — investigations and violent threats, not a master list
Federal reporting by the FBI and interagency products classify threats (Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremism, Anti‑Government, Abortion‑related, etc.) and report investigative caseloads and incident tallies instead of enumerating named groups. The FBI’s domestic-terrorism assessments across 2021–2023 stress that RMVEs and anti‑government violent extremists are top priority threats and note thousands of pending investigations, reflecting active cases rather than an objective “active groups” count. Law enforcement emphasizes incident-driven risk assessments; this operational framing limits public release of comprehensive group lists for privacy, investigative integrity, and legal reasons [7] [8] [3].
4. Incident-focused studies show lethality concentrated in far‑right actors
Analyses removed or summarized from Department of Justice and independent research find that far‑right extremists committed more ideologically motivated homicides than other domestic extremist categories since 1990, with hundreds of lethal events and over 500 lives lost referenced in post‑1990 counts. Security scholars and CSIS datasets covering 1994–2025 report an average of roughly 20 right‑wing terror incidents per year through 2024, though annual totals fluctuate and 2025 showed a marked drop in recorded incidents in one dataset. These incident-based findings underscore the public-safety rationale for monitoring right‑wing networks, but they stop short of producing a single, time‑bound roster of active groups [5] [1].
5. Bottom line for analysts and policymakers — use multiple lenses and be explicit about definitions
If the question demands a single number, the only defensible answer is that no consensus single-number exists across government and civil-society sources because of divergent inclusion rules: some count every chapter and online cell, others count only groups tied to violent plots or ongoing federal investigations. For policy or reporting, specify whether you mean “hate and antigovernment organizations” (SPLC methodology), “groups tied to violent plots and incidents” (CSIS/N IJ focus), or “subjects of FBI domestic‑terror investigations” (FBI caseload). Each lens reveals different risks — political influence, recruitment pipelines, or imminent violent threat — and combining these perspectives yields the most accurate situational picture [2] [5] [3].