How many U.S. citizens have been detained by ICE since 2024, and what are the documented racial demographics of those cases?

Checked on January 17, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Available federal reporting and independent analyses do not provide a verifiable, agency‑published tally of U.S. citizens detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) since 2024; ICE’s public detention and enforcement dashboards are framed around non‑citizens and “aliens,” and the homeland security statistical system that could record citizenship contains fields that public releases and researchers show are incomplete or inconsistently coded [1] [2] [3]. Independent audits of ICE racial data at specific facilities further show systematic misclassification that makes any precise racial‑demographic accounting of detained U.S. citizens — were such detentions numerous enough to be visible in the datasets — impossible to confirm from the available reporting [4] [5].

1. What the official data publicly tracks — and what it does not

ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) materials, dashboards and the agency’s detention statistics are organized around arrests, book‑ins and detentions of people subject to removal (described in ICE terms as “aliens”), and the agency’s public dashboards and spreadsheets present arrests, detentions and removals by categories that emphasize non‑citizen status rather than flagging U.S. citizens as a separately reported cohort [1] [6]. The Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Homeland Security Statistics (OHSS) maintains a statistical system of record that includes citizenship fields and monthly tables that could be used to disaggregate book‑ins by citizenship, but publicly released tables and ICE extracts have methodological differences and known data gaps that complicate using them to produce a simple, authoritative count of U.S. citizens detained since 2024 [2] [3].

2. What independent researchers and watchdogs find — data gaps and misclassification

Investigations by the American Immigration Council and reporting from advocacy groups found clear examples where ICE’s race and ethnicity fields were poorly recorded or misapplied — notably a Torrance County, New Mexico snapshot where ICE labeled roughly 86 percent of detainees “white,” despite evidence that many were from African and Caribbean countries; the Council warns that this “whitewashing” skews any demographic analysis based on ICE’s race fields [4]. Prism and other outlets independently documented the same misclassification patterns and accused ICE of failing to collect or accurately record race and ethnicity in ways that prevent reliable demographic breakdowns [5].

3. Can public sources produce a verified count of U.S. citizens detained since 2024?

No public source in the reviewed reporting provides a validated aggregate number of U.S. citizens detained by ICE since 2024. ICE’s public detention dashboards and FY‑scale spreadsheets are framed on non‑citizen enforcement and do not present a simple published metric for “U.S. citizens detained since 2024,” and OHSS and other DHS tables that could supply such a breakdown are either not published in a way that isolates that population or are known to include processing and coding issues that undercut confidence in a definitive figure [1] [2] [3].

4. What can be said about racial demographics of detainees — and of any U.S. citizens in that set

Available reporting shows that race and ethnicity fields in ICE detention records are unreliable enough to prevent firm conclusions: the Torrance example alone — where 86 percent were coded as white — demonstrates how systematic miscoding can skew demographic percentages and hide racial disparities [4]. OHSS asserts its Persist Dataset is the authoritative record and uses validation steps, but public extracts and ICE’s own caveats about fluctuating and incomplete fields mean researchers caution against treating published race counts as definitive without facility‑level vetting [2] [3] [1].

5. Bottom line and next steps for verification

Given the structure of ICE’s publicly released statistics, the emphasis on non‑citizen enforcement, and documented misclassification problems in race fields, the factual record available in the provided reporting does not support a precise numeric answer to “How many U.S. citizens have been detained by ICE since 2024” nor a trustworthy racial breakdown of those cases; resolving the question would require access to citizenship‑flagged book‑in/book‑out records from OHSS or ICE, cross‑checked at facility level, or FOIA requests and third‑party validation to correct race/ethnicity coding errors highlighted by the American Immigration Council and others [2] [4] [5]. Alternative viewpoints — including ICE’s published dashboards that emphasize data integrity and validation procedures — exist and should be part of any comprehensive audit, but those same ICE statements acknowledge data fluctuation and limits [1].

Want to dive deeper?
How can FOIA requests be structured to obtain ICE book‑in/book‑out records by citizenship and race since 2024?
What facility‑level audits exist showing race/ethnicity misclassification in ICE detention records, and how have they affected analysis?
How does the OHSS Persist Dataset differ from ICE’s public dashboards in tracking citizenship and race fields?