Are there any official statements from local authorities about Virginia Giuffre's death?

1. Police account: call to a Neergabby property and a non‑suspicious early finding

Western Australia Police publicly said they were called to a home in the Neergabby area where Giuffre was found unresponsive, and that the death “is being investigated by Major Crime detectives; early indication is the death is not suspicious,” language reproduced in BBC and other reports that quoted the WA police statement ^{[1] [2]}.

2. Official investigative posture: Major Crime detectives and coroner referral

Local authorities placed Major Crime detectives on the inquiry and framed the matter as an active investigation, while media coverage noted that the coroner would ultimately determine cause of death — a standard local legal process that authorities and Giuffre’s lawyer referenced in separate interviews ^{[1] [5] [2]}.

3. How outlets cited the statements: consistent police language across reporting

NBC, The Guardian, BBC and People all conveyed substantially the same core official claims: emergency services responded to Giuffre’s property, she was found unresponsive, Major Crime detectives were investigating and early indications were that the death was not suspicious — indicating consistent official wording that international news organizations relied on when reporting the local authority position ^{[3] [1] [2] [4]}.

4. Family and legal spokespeople: confirmation of suicide and calls for due process

Giuffre’s family issued a statement saying she “died by suicide,” a claim widely reported in outlets like NBC and The Guardian, and her Australia‑based attorney, Karrie Louden, publicly urged that the coroner would determine cause of death and initially expressed that she did not believe the death was suspicious — comments that were reported alongside police statements about the ongoing investigation ^{[3] [2] [5]}.

5. Divergent voices and subsequent skepticism: father’s comment and media caveats

Reporting also captured subsequent and divergent reactions: Wikipedia’s summary and some outlets noted later remarks by Giuffre’s father suggesting he suspected foul play, and media accounts repeatedly cautioned that “much…is not known” about her final days, underlining that while police characterized the death as non‑suspicious, family doubt and public speculation persisted ^{[5] [1]}.

6. What the official statements do — and do not — say

The official statements, as reported, state facts about the police response, the investigative team, and the early non‑suspicious assessment, but they do not provide a finalized cause of death, detailed forensic findings, or the coroner’s ruling; multiple sources emphasize that a coroner and Major Crime detectives would complete the evidentiary work needed to establish a conclusive cause ^{[1] [2] [5]}.

7. Immediate implications: why those official words matter in context

Given Giuffre’s high public profile and the politically charged history surrounding Epstein‑related allegations, the police’s “not suspicious” phrasing immediately shaped the narrative by reducing the official likelihood of criminal conduct in the death while leaving space for further disclosure from coroner’s findings — a position that both tamped down and fueled speculation depending on whom one read: authorities who framed the case as routine versus family members and others who expressed unease ^{[4] [5]}.

8. Bottom line

Local authorities (Western Australia Police) issued formal on‑the‑record statements: they attended Giuffre’s Neergabby property, Major Crime detectives investigated, and their “early indication” was the death was not suspicious; a coroner’s process remained the next formal step and some family members publicly questioned aspects of the circumstances, meaning the official position answered the immediate legal question but left room for later, authoritative determinations ^{[1] [2] [3]}.