Did Paolo Zampolli admit to facilitating travel or accommodations for Jeffrey Epstein under oath?

Executive summary

No — in the reporting supplied there is no record of Paolo Zampolli admitting under oath that he facilitated travel or accommodations for Jeffrey Epstein; the sources discuss Zampolli’s role in modeling and immigration introductions and allegations of association with Epstein’s network but do not document any sworn testimony in which he confesses to arranging Epstein’s travel or lodging ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. The assembled pieces instead sketch a pattern of professional overlap and second‑hand claims that stop short of showing an under‑oath admission ^{[1] [2] [5]}.

1. Who Paolo Zampolli is, in the available reporting

The supplied articles portray Paolo Zampolli as a New York modeling‑industry figure linked to multiple high‑profile introductions and visa work for models, with outlets describing him as the founder of ID Models/Metropolitan Models and an agent involved in helping Melania Trump emigrate to the United States ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. Those same pieces place Zampolli socially and professionally near Jeffrey Epstein — describing overlapping circles and introductions — but they present that proximity as contextual rather than as independent proof that Zampolli arranged Epstein’s logistics ^{[1] [2]}.

2. What the sources say about Zampolli’s connection to Epstein and to Melania Trump

Multiple summaries and biographical pieces repeat the claim that Zampolli assisted Melania’s immigration and introduced her to Donald Trump, and they link that introduction into broader narratives about Epstein’s social web; for example, Michael Wolff and others have suggested that Zampolli “introduced” Melania and that he had ties to Epstein’s milieu ^{[3] [4]}. Longform commentary about the modeling industry frames Zampolli as a player in the visa/agency side of modeling while naming Epstein and Jean‑Luc Brunel as funders or networked actors — but those discussions are investigatory and inferential rather than records of Zampolli’s own admissions ^{[1] [2]}.

3. Crucially: absence of any cited sworn admission in the provided material

The supplied reporting contains allegations, social links, and historical descriptions of how model agencies, Epstein, Brunel and agents like Zampolli operated in the same ecosystem, but none of the sources present transcripted testimony, deposition excerpts, or court filings showing Zampolli admitting under oath to arranging Epstein’s flights, hotel stays, or accommodations ^{[1] [2] [5] [3] [4]}. That gap is important: allegation and social proximity are repeatedly asserted in commentary and news summaries, but an under‑oath admission would be a discrete, verifiable legal record — which the supplied items do not reproduce ^{[1] [2] [5]}.

4. Alternative interpretations and the limits of the current reporting

There are two plausible readings of the material: one is that Zampolli was a facilitator in the modeling‑immigration pipeline and therefore a plausible logistical contact in Epstein’s orbit ^{[1] [2]}; the other is that journalists and commentators have extrapolated social and professional proximity into implication without producing sworn statements or legal proof that Zampolli personally managed Epstein’s travel or lodging ^{[3] [4]}. The supplied New York Times–style investigation traces Epstein’s money and networks broadly but does not supply a deposition or plea transcript attributing those specific logistics to Zampolli ^[5].

5. Motives, agendas and why narratives harden without sworn testimony

Some commentary pieces — especially opinion or longform essays — emphasize systemic industry culpability or political angles that can push readers from “associated with” to “directly aided,” an implicit agenda that amplifies suspicion when documentation is thin ^{[1] [2]}. Conversely, other outlets that relay Michael Wolff’s claims are reporting a provocative claim that has political resonance but still rely on second‑hand accounts and public photographs rather than court‑recorded admissions ^{[3] [4]}.

6. Bottom line and journalistic caveat

Based on the provided sources, Zampolli has been portrayed as connected to modeling immigration work and as part of social circles that overlapped with Jeffrey Epstein’s, but there is no documented under‑oath admission in these pieces that he arranged Epstein’s travel or accommodations; the evidence in the supplied reporting is circumstantial and reputational rather than a transcript or sworn statement proving facilitation ^{[1] [2] [5] [3] [4]}. If a reader requires confirmation beyond these sources — for example, a deposition, court filing, or other legal document in which Zampolli pleads or testifies — that record was not included among the materials provided here and so cannot be affirmed by this report.