Are there any public court transcripts or depositions of Paolo Zampolli related to Jeffrey Epstein investigations?

Checked on February 2, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

There are no publicly available court transcripts or deposition records of Paolo Zampolli tied to Jeffrey Epstein that appear in the sources provided for this review; reporting and official repositories about the Epstein investigations discuss wide document releases and name various associates but do not identify any Zampolli transcripts or depositions [1] [2] [3] [4]. The record in these sources shows extensive document dumps and litigation over grand jury material, meaning undisclosed materials could still exist, but the documents known to be public as of these reports do not include a Paolo Zampolli deposition or transcript [5] [6].

1. What the official repositories show — broad releases, not Zampolli-specific files

The Department of Justice established an “Epstein Library” and related disclosure pages cataloguing materials and releases from investigations, but the public listings in the DOJ portal and its disclosure pages reviewed here do not cite any court transcript or sworn deposition attributed to Paolo Zampolli [1] [2]. Those DOJ pages are the primary official clearinghouse referenced by news outlets for material about the federal inquiries, and while they signal continuing disclosures, the databases and summaries available in the sources consulted do not include a named transcript for Zampolli [1] [2].

2. News coverage of released documents names many well-known figures but not Zampolli transcripts

Major media coverage of the rolling releases — exemplified by The New York Times summaries and news organizations tracking the files — highlights a range of names and newly released interviews and slide decks, and notes a “hunger” for more disclosure, but the NYT reporting cited here catalogs other public figures and investigative summaries rather than any deposition or court transcript of Paolo Zampolli [3]. The news narrative in those reports focuses on documents that DOJ and courts have already released or litigated over, without evidence in these sources that Zampolli provided sworn testimony that has been made public.

3. Grand jury and other sealed materials remain a live issue that could change the public record

Courts and lawmakers have recently been pressured to unseal grand jury transcripts and other materials in the Epstein probes, and reporting notes judges ordering releases and legislation — developments that could reveal previously sealed testimony — but the examples in the supplied reporting concern broader grand jury materials and specific motions, not an identified public deposition of Zampolli [5] [6] [4]. The point is procedural: substantial troves remain contested and future court orders or DOJ disclosures could conceivably surface new names or transcripts that are not yet public [5] [6].

4. Known social links and public mentions of Zampolli, contrasted with absence of deposition records

Paolo Zampolli appears in social-scene and reporting context as a modeling agent and acquaintance in Epstein-era social circles — for instance, an earlier Page Six-style listing and Business Insider profile mention Zampolli among New York social figures connected to Epstein-era networks — but those mentions are journalistic and social, not legal-transcript citations; the Business Insider piece shows association but does not indicate he provided court testimony in the Epstein investigations made public in the materials reviewed [7]. Thus the sources confirm social proximity in reporting but do not supply any public court deposition or transcript for Zampolli.

5. Limits of the available reporting and how to follow up

This analysis is strictly limited to the sources provided: DOJ’s Epstein pages, mainstream reporting and compilations of Epstein files, Wikipedia’s summary of litigation over disclosures, and news about grand jury-unsealing efforts; none of these sources in the dataset contain or point to a public Paolo Zampolli deposition or court transcript [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. If the public record is expanded by future DOJ releases or court orders unsealing grand jury testimony, those repositories and major outlets would be the first places to check; absent that, there is no documented public deposition or transcript of Paolo Zampolli in the supplied materials.

Want to dive deeper?
Are there public court transcripts naming other Epstein associates released by the DOJ Epstein Library?
What grand jury materials related to Jeffrey Epstein have courts ordered unsealed as of 2025 and 2026?
What reporting links Paolo Zampolli socially to Jeffrey Epstein and what are the primary sources for those claims?