What public statements has Paolo Zampolli made about Jeffrey Epstein in primary interviews or legal filings?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Paolo Zampolli’s public, documented statements about Jeffrey Epstein in the sources provided are narrow and framed mostly around who introduced Melania Trump to Donald Trump—Zampolli has asserted he introduced the couple, a claim reported alongside competing claims by Epstein—while reporting also notes social and professional ties between Zampolli and Epstein without a record in these sources of Zampolli making extended public comments about Epstein’s criminal conduct or business practices [1] [2] [3]. The available reporting shows more about how others characterize Zampolli’s relationship with Epstein than about detailed, primary statements from Zampolli himself [3] [4].
1. Zampolli’s explicit, repeated public claim: “I introduced Melania and Donald Trump”
Multiple outlets record that Zampolli has publicly maintained he introduced Melania Knauss to Donald Trump at a party in 1998, a claim that became central to disputes after others, including Hunter Biden, suggested Jeffrey Epstein played that role; NewsNation and related coverage report Zampolli’s version of events and that Donald Trump told reporters the same when he first discussed dating Melania [1] [5]. NewsBreak summarizes the competing public claims by noting that both Zampolli and Epstein later claimed they had introduced the couple, indicating Zampolli’s role as a publicly stated fact in press accounts [2].
2. Reporting ties Zampolli to Epstein socially and professionally, but not to detailed admissions
Journalistic accounts cited here describe Zampolli as having ties to Epstein and to Ghislaine Maxwell’s social circles and identify his role in modeling and visa facilitation as relevant to Melania’s move to the U.S.; Michael Wolff’s reporting and summaries frame Zampolli as a connector within that milieu, yet those pieces do not present a record of Zampolli admitting culpability for or detailed knowledge of Epstein’s criminal activities in the items provided [3] [4]. The Medium piece characterizes Zampolli’s role in the modeling/visa system and links him to Epstein-adjacent practices, but it is an interpretive account rather than a primary transcript of Zampolli making confessional statements about Epstein [4].
3. Competing narratives and denials in the public record
The dispute over who introduced Melania is a focal point where Zampolli’s statements intersect with other public actors: Melania Trump’s lawyers have threatened legal action against public allegations that Epstein introduced her to Trump, and public denials stress Zampolli’s introduction as the couple’s version of events [5] [1]. Reporting thus shows an implicit contest of credibility—Zampolli’s claim is used to rebut claims linking Melania to Epstein—yet the sources document rebuttals and legal warnings rather than a multi-page public testimony by Zampolli about Epstein [5] [1].
4. What the sources do not show: no detailed interview transcripts or legal filings by Zampolli about Epstein’s crimes
Within the supplied reporting there is no primary interview transcript or court filing from Paolo Zampolli in which he gives a sustained account of Jeffrey Epstein’s conduct, finances, trafficking operations, or a detailed explanation of his own relationship to Epstein beyond social ties and the introduction claim; therefore it is not possible from these sources to cite Zampolli admitting knowledge of, participation in, or legal responsibility for Epstein’s crimes [3] [2] [4]. Absent such primary material in the provided set, asserting that Zampolli made detailed public statements on those topics would exceed what the reporting supports.
5. Why the distinction matters: public statements vs. reporting inference
The available sources show two separate evidentiary threads: on one hand, direct reportage of Zampolli’s claim to have introduced the Trumps (used by allies and critics alike), and on the other hand, investigative interpretations that place Zampolli in Epstein’s wider social and professional network without quoting extended primary statements from Zampolli himself [1] [3] [4]. Observers should therefore distinguish between Zampolli’s limited, documented public claims (chiefly the introduction) and broader journalistic allegations or inferences about his role in a modeling-visa ecosystem that may link him to Epstein’s networks; the supplied materials substantiate the former but do not provide primary-source confirmations of the latter by Zampolli himself [2] [4].