Who was the pastor shot with a pepper ball by ICE
Users have flagged this fact-check as potentially inaccurate. Read critically and verify claims independently.
Executive Summary
Rev. David Black of the First Presbyterian Church in Chicago is the pastor who was struck in the head with a pepper ball fired by an ICE agent during a protest outside the Broadview ICE facility; multiple news outlets and video accounts identify him and place the incident on or about September 19, 2025 [1] [2] [3]. Reports and footage show Black was praying and not engaging physically with agents according to his account, while Department of Homeland Security officials and some DHS statements assert protesters were obstructing operations and that projectiles had been thrown at agents, creating sharply divergent narratives over what prompted the use of force [4] [5] [6].
1. Who was hit — a Chicago pastor made central in a viral video
Multiple independent news organizations named Reverend David Black, senior pastor at the First Presbyterian Church in Chicago, as the man struck by a pepper ball during protests outside the Broadview ICE processing facility; video evidence circulated by local and national outlets shows a man identified as Black being hit in the head from a rooftop vantage [1] [2] [6]. Black’s church affiliation and role at First Presbyterian in Chicago were consistently reported, and eyewitness accounts and cellphone footage were cited repeatedly to corroborate identity. The coverage includes sustained attention to the injury’s visible aftermath — outlets describe a dent and lingering respiratory effects — making Black both the symbolic and documented focal point in reporting on that confrontation [6] [7].
2. Conflicting accounts — protesters’ portrayal versus DHS defense
The incident is framed sharply differently by Reverend Black and his supporters versus Department of Homeland Security representatives: Black and witnesses say he was praying and posed no threat, asserting the pepper ball struck him while he stood with hands raised and that agents were laughing as they fired, while DHS officials contend that protesters blocked ICE vehicles and threw rocks, bottles, and fireworks at agents on the roof, justifying use of crowd-control measures [7] [5] [4]. This divergence matters legally and politically because it underpins a lawsuit alleging First and Fourth Amendment violations against federal officers; it also shapes public perceptions about whether force was a proportionate, defensive response or an excessive suppression of protest [8] [5].
3. Evidence on the ground — what video and contemporaneous reporting show
Video footage published by local outlets and shared by witnesses appears to show an agent firing a projectile from a rooftop position that struck Black in the head; the visual record is the linchpin allowing multiple outlets to identify the pastor and to trigger immediate public scrutiny and legal filings [1] [9] [2]. Reporting notes the projectile type as a pepper ball — a kinetic irritant round — and documents that Black later experienced respiratory issues and a visible wound; those on-the-ground observations are central to the civil complaint and subsequent media analyses. However, video alone does not capture all context such as actions on the roof or any specific objects allegedly thrown toward officers, which is where DHS narratives and official after-action accounts attempt to fill informational gaps [1] [4].
4. Legal and political fallout — lawsuit, DHS defense, and broader implications
Following the incident, Reverend Black and his legal representatives filed a lawsuit claiming violation of constitutional rights, and the episode has been elevated into a broader debate about federal use of force against immigration protestors, including statements of defense from DHS officials asserting operational necessity [8] [5] [3]. The legal complaint leans on video and witness testimony to argue the action was unprovoked; DHS responses emphasize alleged obstruction and assault on officers to justify crowd-dispersal measures. This clash has predictably drawn partisan attention: civil-rights and immigrant-advocacy groups emphasize suppression of protest and religious liberty, while federal officials and some conservatives stress officer safety and enforcement prerogatives, signaling competing agendas shaping how facts are prioritized in public discourse [3] [5].
5. What remains unresolved and what to watch next
Key unresolved questions include the full scope of what occurred on the rooftop that DHS cites, whether specific protocols for use of pepper-ball munitions were followed, and how independent investigations will reconcile video, eyewitness testimony, and DHS operational reports; these gaps determine legal liability and policy consequences. Future reporting and official investigations — including any internal DHS review, bodycam or surveillance footage release, and court discovery — will be decisive in establishing chronology and intent. For now, the record solidly identifies Reverend David Black as the pastor struck, documents his account and visible injury, and records DHS counterclaims about hostile protester behavior, leaving factual adjudication to pending legal and administrative processes [7] [5] [6].