Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What legal penalties do buyers face for purchasing stolen credit card data in the US in 2024
Executive summary
Buying stolen credit‑card data in the U.S. can trigger federal charges that carry heavy prison terms, large fines, forfeiture, restitution, and guideline sentencing—federal statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (device fraud) and related provisions are routinely used and can carry sentences in the range of years to decades depending on the offense and loss amount [1] [2]. Sentencing data and guideline amendments show average federal sentences around roughly two years for credit‑card and financial‑instrument fraud cases and special increases for "breeding" or trafficking in access devices [3] [4].
1. What federal statutes prosecutors use — the toolbox
Federal prosecutors commonly charge purchasers of stolen card data under statutes addressing fraudulent use, production, trafficking or possession of “access devices” — notably provisions in 18 U.S.C. § 1029 and related federal fraud and identity‑theft statutes; defense sites and practitioner summaries emphasize that interstate use or transport triggers federal jurisdiction [1] [5]. Legal practice guides and defense firms warn that using stolen card numbers, creating counterfeit cards, or moving card data across state lines are classic fact patterns for federal indictments [1] [5].
2. Typical penalties alleged in federal cases
Practice‑oriented sources summarize potential penalties as substantial: convictions under the federal credit‑card and access‑device statutes can expose defendants to multi‑year prison terms and large fines—some summaries cite ranges like 10–15 years or, in other contexts, up to 20 years depending on the specific statute and conduct—with possible fines up to about $250,000 and forfeiture or restitution obligations [1] [2] [6]. These are legal summaries written for litigants; exact exposure depends on which subsection is charged and the loss, number of victims, and aggravating conduct [1] [2].
3. How sentencing actually looks in practice
Government sentencing data give more granular context: for federal cases categorized as “credit card and other financial instrument fraud,” the United States Sentencing Commission reports an average imposed sentence near 26 months in recent fiscal years and guideline minimums higher in many cases—showing that while statutory maxima can be very high, average prison terms in charged cases tend to be measured in years, not decades [3]. The Commission also reports that only a portion of fraud cases are in this category, and outcomes vary widely by offense conduct and criminal history [3].
4. Sentencing enhancements and trafficking/“breeding” aggravators
The Sentencing Commission and guideline amendments explicitly increase penalties for manufacturing or trafficking in access devices and for “breeding” means of identification (creating new IDs from stolen data). Amendment 596 established a minimum offense level and two‑point increases for conduct such as producing or trafficking in counterfeit or stolen credit cards, signaling tougher treatment for sellers or traffickers of stolen card data versus isolated users [4]. Prosecutors will seek these enhancements when evidence shows production, large‑scale trafficking, or identity “breeding” [4].
5. State law and variability — misdemeanors to felonies
State law varies widely: some state prosecutions treat isolated small‑value thefts as misdemeanors while more sophisticated or higher‑loss schemes are charged as felonies with multi‑year state sentences and fines; legal resources note the same conduct can be a misdemeanor in one state and a felony in another, and possession of multiple stolen cards or use across jurisdictions increases felony risk [7]. Available sources do not provide a comprehensive list of every state penalty in 2024, but FindLaw typifies the state‑by‑state variability and examples of local penalties [7].
6. Civil and administrative consequences for businesses and intermediaries
Beyond criminal exposure to buyers of data, businesses that handle cardholder data face regulatory and contract‑driven consequences: PCI‑DSS noncompliance and state breach laws can trigger fines, settlements, and contractual penalties from card networks—examples of multimillion‑dollar settlements after breaches illustrate that civil and administrative costs can dwarf individual criminal fines [8] [9]. State breach‑notification schemes and penalties are also in play for entities that fail to protect or notify—source material highlights variable civil penalties and per‑victim calculations in state law guides [10] [8].
7. Caveats, defenses, and real‑world nuance
Defense counsel materials emphasize defenses and nuance: lack of specific intent, good‑faith receipt (e.g., unknowingly given a stolen gift card), entrapment, or being unaware data were stolen can affect charging and conviction risk [1]. Also, statutory maxima cited by legal guides are not the same as typical outcomes—average sentences reported by the Sentencing Commission show many cases result in sentences substantially below the highest possible penalties [1] [3].
Conclusion — what this means for a buyer of stolen card data in 2024
Prosecutors have a variety of federal and state tools that can lead to substantial prison time, heavy fines, forfeiture and restitution for buying stolen card data; trafficking and identity‑creation conduct draw higher guideline penalties, while actual sentences in federal cases often average around a couple years though statutory maxima can be much higher [1] [3] [4].