What specific exhibits (by exhibit number) were entered into evidence at the 2005 People v. Jackson trial, and which contained video or photographic material?

1. What the public record reviewed here actually shows about the 2005 trial

The trial of The People v. Jackson was a high‑profile criminal prosecution in Santa Barbara County in 2005 that began with jury selection in late January and proceeded through a multi‑month trial culminating in acquittal ^[2]; contemporaneous reporting and later summaries emphasize intense media attention and judicial restrictions, including a ban on cameras and a gag order ^[2], and note that some documentary footage (Living With Michael Jackson) and television re‑enactments were in the orbit of public discussion about the case ^[6], but none of the supplied sources publishes an itemized list of exhibits admitted at trial by exhibit number.

2. What the supplied sources say about sealed or unavailable materials

Legal summaries and case briefs of People v. Jackson confirm that several core prosecutorial documents were sealed by court order — described specifically as the grand‑jury transcript, the indictment, the search warrant and various other documents — a status that undercuts the public availability of trial‑related materials that might otherwise identify exhibit numbers or media content ^[1]; the presence of sealed filings in the record is a direct explanation, documented in the reporting consulted, for why an exhibit inventory is not openly accessible in those sources ^[1].

3. What can be inferred about photographic and video evidence in the case (and limits of inference)

General evidentiary practice cited in the sources confirms that photographs, still images and video are commonly offered as real or demonstrative exhibits in criminal trials and admitted when foundation and authenticity are established ^{[3] [5] [4]}, and contemporaneous public materials about the Jackson case reference televised footage and documentary segments that framed public perception ^[6], but the reviewed reporting does not identify exhibit numbers or provide a verified list of which numbered exhibits introduced into evidence at Santa Maria contained photographs or video; therefore any claim that a particular numbered exhibit did or did not contain photographic material would exceed what the supplied sources support ^{[3] [5]}.

4. Sources that do list exhibits in other Michael Jackson matters — not the 2005 criminal trial

A modern compilation by a law firm lists numerous numbered exhibits tied to later litigation and unrelated proceedings in the Jackson estate and other matters (for example: Exhibit‑380 series, Exhibit‑399‑1, Exhibit‑500‑324 through Exhibit‑500‑328) and labels some items as photographs ^[7], but that Panish list appears to reflect a different docket and later document collections rather than the 2005 People v. Jackson criminal trial in Santa Barbara, so it cannot be relied on as an authoritative exhibit index for that trial without court‑record confirmation ^[7].

5. Bottom line and what to do next to obtain the exhibit numbers

The reporting provided documents the trial’s framework, the court’s sealing orders, and general evidentiary practice regarding photographs and video ^{[2] [1] [3] [5]}, but it does not contain the requested exhibit‑by‑exhibit numbered inventory for People v. Jackson or a verified mapping showing which admitted exhibits contained photographic or video material; to produce the exact exhibit numbers and identify media content would require direct inspection of the Santa Barbara County Superior Court trial record, exhibit lists or clerk’s docket entries (not contained in the supplied sources) or authenticated exhibit logs from counsel or the court ^[1].