What percentage of homicides nationally are intraracial (same-race victim and offender) in recent years according to SHR or NIBRS?

Checked on January 30, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Federal homicide data systems and the academic literature consistently show that the vast majority of murders in the United States are intraracial—victim and offender sharing the same race—but the sources provided here do not contain a single, citable line that gives a precise national percentage for “recent years” drawn directly from SHR or NIBRS tables; instead, the FBI’s Supplementary/Expanded Homicide data and the BJS/NIBRS reports are the documented places to obtain those exact figures [1] [2].

1. What the official systems say about where to look for intraracial data

Two principal federal crime-data resources record the race of victims and offenders: the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports/Expanded Homicide Data and the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), now used in BJS estimation programs; both are the immediate sources for any national intraracial-versus-interracial breakdown, and the FBI’s tables (for example Expanded Homicide Data Table 6 and Table 43) and the BJS Homicide Victimization report are the specific documents to consult for counts and rates [1] [3] [2].

2. What these sources establish about the pattern (but not the exact percent in the provided excerpts)

The provided materials and scholarship clearly establish the empirical pattern: most homicides are intraracial, a finding repeatedly highlighted in SHR/NIBRS-based analyses and syntheses of race and crime, but the excerpts here do not include a numeric percentage for recent national years and instead point users to the underlying tables and the BJS/NIBRS estimation program for 2021–2023 for precise estimates [4] [2] [1].

3. Why a precise national percentage can be tricky right now

Two practical complications limit a straightforward single-number answer in recent years: first, the U.S. data system has been transitioning from the SHR framework to NIBRS-based estimation, so national estimates for 2021–2023 are generated through BJS’s NIBRS Estimation Program rather than the historical SHR totals [2]; second, not all agencies submit full race-of-offender data or participate equally in reporting, which is explicitly why FBI tables and BJS reports carry notes about coverage, estimation, and confidence intervals—these caveats matter when converting raw counts into a national intraracial percentage [1] [2].

4. How researchers and commentators contextualize the intraracial pattern

Scholars and public commentators repeatedly link the predominance of intraracial homicide to exposure, opportunity, and segregation patterns—what some call a “macrostructural opportunity” explanation—rather than intrinsic propensities of any group; that interpretation appears across summaries of the literature and in discussions of SHR/NIBRS findings, signaling that intraracial crime is driven largely by where people live, socialize, and come into conflict, an argument explicitly summarized in reviews of race-and-crime research [4] [5].

5. Alternative viewpoints and the limits of the provided reporting

Alternative readings emphasize that reporting gaps, differential policing, and undercounting in certain jurisdictions can distort perceived racial patterns; the provided FBI and BJS materials themselves warn about coverage limits and estimation uncertainty, and academic reviews note methodological variations between SHR, NIBRS, and vital-statistics-based studies that can yield different emphases [2] [4] [6]. The sources given do not, within the excerpts supplied, provide a single recent-year intraracial percentage that can be quoted without pulling the underlying tables.

6. Where to get the single-number answer and why it will be defensible

To obtain a defensible national percentage for “recent years” one must extract counts of victim–offender race pairings from the FBI’s Expanded/SHR homicide tables or the BJS NIBRS-estimated homicide tables and compute the share that are same-race, while taking account of the BJS confidence intervals for 2021–2023; the FBI’s Expanded Homicide Data Table 6 and the BJS Homicide Victimization (NIBRS Estimation Program) report are the explicit sources to use for that calculation [1] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What do the FBI Expanded Homicide Data tables (Table 6 and Table 43) report for intraracial vs interracial homicides in 2019–2023?
How does the BJS NIBRS Estimation Program compute national homicide race pairings for 2021–2023 and what are the confidence intervals?
How have reporting coverage gaps and missing race-of-offender fields affected historical SHR estimates of intraracial homicide?