What is Pete Sulack's medical license status and history in state board records?
Executive summary
Available public records in the provided results show Pete (Peter) Sulack listed as a chiropractor with NPI 1053320887 and Tennessee license number DC0000001857 in the NPI registry [1]. Other items describe him as “Dr. Pete” working as a medical consultant and clinic founder, but official state medical-board license lookup pages returned in the search results do not include a direct board record for a physician license for him in those sources [2] [3] [4].
1. Who the records identify: chiropractor with an NPI number
The clearest direct record in the supplied material is an NPI profile that lists “PETER C SULACK D.C.” with NPI 1053320887 and a Tennessee license number DC0000001857, indicating a chiropractic license in Tennessee [1]. That NPI entry is the primary official-sounding credential in the dataset provided.
2. Public-facing bios portray a broader “doctor” role
Multiple non-regulatory pages present Pete Sulack as “Dr. Pete” — a founder, medical consultant and integrative-wellness figure — and describe clinical work and patient volumes at clinics [2] [5]. Those bios do not substitute for state medical-board verification and do not specify what state medical (MD/DO) license, if any, he holds; the supplied bios emphasize his role in integrative care and consulting [2] [5].
3. What the state board links in the results can — and cannot — confirm
Search results include links to several state medical board license-lookup pages (California, Texas, South Carolina, Alabama) but none of the supplied pages provide a direct lookup result showing a physician (MD/DO) license for Pete Sulack [3] [4] [6] [7]. The presence of these board landing pages means an examiner could use them to verify a physician license, but the provided sources do not show an outcome of such a lookup.
4. Discrepancy between “Dr.” branding and available licensing evidence
The dataset shows an NPI entry for a licensed chiropractor (D.C.) and separate promotional or clinic materials using the title “Dr. Pete” [1] [2] [5]. This is not proof of a physician (MD/DO) license; chiropractors commonly use the D.C. title. The supplied state board pages do not confirm any MD/DO license for Sulack in the results provided [3] [4] [7].
5. Records not found in current reporting — limitations you should note
Available sources do not mention a state medical-board disciplinary history or active MD/DO license record for Pete Sulack; they also do not show any physician-license lookup result [1] [2] [3]. If you need an authoritative, current status for an MD/DO license or disciplinary actions, the direct license-lookup tool on the relevant state medical board should be queried; those tools are linked in the provided results but no search outcome was provided here [3] [4] [7].
6. How to verify further (and why it matters)
To confirm current licensure or disciplinary history you must run his name or license number through the appropriate state board’s lookup tool (examples provided: Medical Board of California, Texas Medical Board, South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners) because public bios and NPI listings are incomplete substitutes for board verification [3] [4] [7]. The NPI record establishes a chiropractic license in Tennessee (DC0000001857) but does not speak to any physician license or disciplinary record [1].
7. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas in the sources
Promotional clinic pages and profiles present Sulack as an influential integrative clinician and “doctor turned survivor,” language designed to build authority and attract patients [2] [5]. The NPI entry is an administrative record that simply lists credentials without promotional framing [1]. Readers should weigh self-promotional content against independent regulatory verification when assessing clinical claims and titles.
Limitations: this analysis uses only the results you supplied. The supplied state board links do not contain lookup outcomes for Sulack; therefore I do not assert the absence of any physician license or disciplinary action beyond saying such records are not present in the provided material [1] [2] [3] [4] [7].