Which plaintiffs and organizations are suing Trump in the cancer-related case and what damages do they seek?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
No reporting in the supplied sources identifies a plaintiff group currently suing Donald Trump in a case described as “cancer‑related”; instead the documents describe (a) private plaintiffs suing Monsanto/Bayer over Roundup and (b) federal enforcement litigation brought by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Justice against a chemical plant in Louisiana’s “Cancer Alley,” which the Trump administration later moved to drop [1] [2] [3] [4]. The available coverage therefore does not support a claim that named cancer victims or community organizations are suing Trump himself, and it is important to distinguish plaintiffs who have sued private companies from government enforcement actions that the Trump DOJ has chosen to abandon or reverse [1] [4].
1. Private plaintiffs suing Bayer/Monsanto over Roundup and the damages they seek
Thousands of individual plaintiffs — including high‑profile claimants such as Dewayne Johnson and John Durnell — have sued Monsanto (now owned by Bayer), alleging that Roundup (glyphosate) caused non‑Hodgkin lymphoma and other cancers; juries have awarded plaintiffs substantial verdicts in a series of cases, and Bayer has paid out over $10 billion in settlements to resolve many claims while roughly tens of thousands of claims remain pending [1] [2] [5]. Reporting cites a pool of roughly 65,000–67,000 remaining claims and notes that Bayer has lobbied and pursued Supreme Court review of state jury verdicts such as the $1.25 million award in Missouri to John Durnell; plaintiffs collectively seek damages for medical costs, lost income, pain and suffering, and punitive damages that, in the aggregate, have approached or exceeded billions of dollars [2] [5] [1].
2. The Trump administration’s legal posture in Roundup litigation — not plaintiffs suing Trump
What the reporting documents is the Trump Justice Department filing a brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to accept Bayer’s argument that federal pesticide law preempts state‑law claims, a move that would narrow or potentially eliminate many of the tens of thousands of Roundup suits — a government intervention defending a corporation rather than a private suit against Trump himself [2] [6]. The shift contrasts with prior Biden‑era DOJ filings that had allowed state‑law liability claims to proceed, and the Trump DOJ’s position, if adopted by the Court, would reduce plaintiffs’ avenues for recovering damages [2] [6].
3. “Cancer Alley” litigation: government plaintiffs, community harms, and the Trump administration’s withdrawal
Separate from Roundup claims, the EPA and the Department of Justice under the Biden administration sued Denka over chloroprene emissions in St. John the Baptist Parish — litigation framed as an effort to eliminate what the agencies said were emissions creating an “unacceptably high cancer risk” to nearby communities and a local elementary school; that federal enforcement action effectively represented the interests of impacted residents and environmental‑justice advocates such as Sharon Lavigne [3] [4]. Reporting states that the Trump administration decided to drop that enforcement lawsuit, a policy reversal criticized by community members and environmental groups who framed the suit as protecting communities suffering cancer clusters from industrial pollution [4] [7].
4. What the sources do not show — no identified plaintiffs suing Trump for cancer harms or seeking damages from him
None of the supplied sources present a lawsuit in which cancer victims or community groups are suing Donald Trump personally and seeking compensatory or punitive damages from him for cancer‑related harms; instead the material documents either private suits against corporations (Roundup plaintiffs vs. Monsanto/Bayer) or federal enforcement suits the administration itself pursued and later abandoned (EPA/DOJ vs. Denka) [1] [2] [3] [4]. If there is a different or newer “cancer‑related case” that names Trump as a defendant, that lawsuit is not described in the sources provided and cannot be identified or summarized here without additional reporting.