How effective have policing and gang-reduction programs been in San Salvador versus neighboring capitals?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
San Salvador’s recent policing and gang-reduction push — a mix of mass arrests under a prolonged state of emergency, territorial control operations and some local prevention experiments — has coincided with a dramatic fall in reported homicides and extortion complaints, but at the cost of widespread rights abuses and lingering questions about sustainability and displacement of violence to rural areas or neighboring capitals [1] [2] [3]. By contrast, neighboring capitals that adopted lighter or differently calibrated crackdowns — notably Tegucigalpa and San Pedro Sula in Honduras — have seen mixed results and more visible struggle to replicate El Salvador’s steep homicide declines without similar repressive measures [1] [4].
1. San Salvador: dramatic declines on paper, heavy-handed methods in practice
Official statistics and multiple observers report that homicides in El Salvador have plunged from near-century highs to very low levels — with some sources citing an official rate around 2.4 per 100,000 in recent years — and that large parts of previously gang-controlled San Salvador are now largely extortion-free [1] [2]. Those gains have taken place alongside a state of emergency that enabled mass arrests — Human Rights Watch and other monitors say police and soldiers detained over 81,000 people, including thousands of children — and extraordinary powers for security forces, raising credible allegations of arbitrary detention, torture and due-process violations [3] [5].
2. Honduras’ capitals: similar tools, different outcomes and contested data
Honduras imposed its own “state of exception” in high-crime zones of Tegucigalpa and San Pedro Sula and publicly pursued aggressive anti-extortion and anti-gang campaigns, yet analysts describe more uneven results and persistent doubts about counting methods and displacement effects; USIP notes Honduras’ crackdown contrasted with El Salvador’s outcomes and emphasizes capacity-building and citizen trust as crucial components that Honduras needs to consolidate [1] [4]. Observers caution that official declines can mask exclusions — for example, killings omitted from tallies because victims died in clashes with police or were found in clandestine graves — which complicates direct comparisons between capitals [1].
3. Prevention and community policing: promising pilots, murky margins
Beyond repression, El Salvador has a mixed record on prevention: municipal and NGO-led programs and some local community policing models have shown localized benefits, and President Nayib Bukele has previously endorsed preventive measures, but researchers and practitioners emphasize that prevention takes time and remains under-resourced compared with large-scale incarceration and military deployments [6] [4]. In rural pilots outside San Salvador, reported gains sometimes sit alongside warnings of vigilantism and informal checkpoints that blur policing and community justice, undercutting clear attribution of success to state programs alone [7].
4. Human rights, legitimacy and political incentives shape comparative effectiveness
The tradeoff in San Salvador has been sharp: security gains on traditional crime metrics come paired with documented human-rights abuses and consolidation of executive power, which human-rights groups warn could entrench longer-term governance problems and inhibit community cooperation with police [3] [8]. The Salvadoran approach has been popular domestically and admired by some foreign politicians, but critics argue the heavy emphasis on mass detention risks sweeping up innocents and preventing accountability for real perpetrators — a dynamic that neighboring capitals have watched warily when considering similar tactics [8] [5].
5. Sustainability and geographic displacement: the open questions
Independent analysts and intelligence reports note that gangs have not been erased; some leadership or armed cells appear to have retreated to mountainous or rural areas, and extortion persists outside major urban cores, suggesting that victories in San Salvador may represent displacement or temporary disruption rather than permanent dismantling of networks [2] [9]. Comparative evidence indicates that neighboring capitals that combine improved investigative capacity, anti-corruption measures and long-term prevention policies stand a better chance of durable reductions without the attendant rights costs, but those investments are slower and politically harder to sell [1] [4].