Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Were the terms of the Prince Andrew–Virginia Giuffre settlement made public in 2022?
Executive Summary
The claim that the terms of the Prince Andrew–Virginia Giuffre settlement were made public in 2022 is incorrect: contemporary reporting and later accounts indicate the settlement was announced and filed but the specific financial terms were not publicly disclosed. Reporting at the time described a confidential out-of-court resolution; later sources continue to report the amount as undisclosed even while summarizing surrounding developments and estimates [1] [2] [3].
1. What people claimed and why it spread like wildfire
Multiple documents and headlines from February 2022 announced that Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre had reached a settlement to resolve her civil lawsuit, which created a clear public record that the case had been resolved rather than litigated to verdict. Some accounts and a PDF notice of settlement filed in court were circulated widely and were interpreted by some readers as making all terms public, but the contemporaneous reporting explicitly stated that the specific dollar or pound amount and many settlement details remained confidential, a point reiterated in major outlets [1] [4]. This distinction—between the existence of a settlement and the confidentiality of its financial terms—explains why some summaries were misread or simplified into claims that the terms were public, while primary reporting described the agreement as undisclosed.
2. What contemporaneous sources actually reported in 2022
News organizations and court filings from February 2022 recorded the settlement announcement and the official filing that the parties had resolved the suit, but they uniformly emphasized that the payment amount and several terms were not revealed to the public. The New York Times reported the settlement while noting the lack of disclosed terms and described the agreement as out-of-court and confidential; legal notices filed on behalf of Giuffre confirm a settlement occurred without attaching a public dollar figure [1] [4]. That contemporaneous record is the core factual basis: the settlement’s existence was publicized, but the contract terms were not made public in 2022, despite circulation of settlement-related documents and references to other, older settlements involving different parties.
3. Later accounts, memoirs, and persistent uncertainty
Subsequent reporting and Virginia Giuffre’s 2025 memoir provide additional narrative detail about the events and allegations but do not disclose the confidential numeric terms of the 2022 settlement. Reporting as late as October 2025 continues to state that Prince Andrew paid a multi-million-pound out-of-court settlement without identifying the exact amount, and Giuffre’s memoir recounts allegations and context while leaving the settlement terms undisclosed [2] [3] [5]. Some outlets and commentators have offered estimates—one British newspaper cited figures as high as £12 million—but those remain estimates or speculation rather than documentation of a public release of contractual terms [6] [2].
4. The data that caused confusion: public filings versus confidential details
Part of the confusion stems from the difference between public court filings that record a notice of settlement and the detailed settlement agreement, which parties frequently keep confidential. A PDF notice filed in February 2022 put the settlement on the court docket and was reported widely, leading some to assume full transparency; however the notice itself typically affirms resolution without attaching the private settlement contract or specifying monetary terms [4] [1]. Separately, an older 2009 settlement involving Jeffrey Epstein and Giuffre became public in January 2022 and complicated public understanding of what was and was not newly disclosed in the Prince Andrew case, feeding misperceptions about what settlement terms were available publicly [7].
5. How to interpret the record and what remains open
The settled record shows a public confirmation that the 2022 case ended in settlement, but the contractual numbers and many specific terms were kept confidential; subsequent journalism and memoirs have reinforced that reality rather than overturning it. Reporting across 2022 and through 2025 therefore supports the conclusion that the terms were not made public in 2022, with later sources continuing to respect or note that confidentiality while sometimes relaying third‑party estimates [1] [2] [3]. Readers should treat estimates reported by newspapers as speculative unless a copy of the settlement agreement is produced or one of the parties releases the contract details publicly.