Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Who else among prominent figures appears in Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs?
Executive summary
Flight logs associated with Jeffrey Epstein’s aircrafts—introduced in court and partially released by government agencies—include numerous well‑known names across politics, entertainment and business, among them Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew, Naomi Campbell, Kevin Spacey and others [1] [2] [3]. The logs themselves are raw records: appearing on a log does not, by itself, prove wrongdoing; pilots’ testimony and other documentary evidence are necessary to interpret entries [4] [5].
1. What the flight logs are and how they’ve been used
The flight logs are pilots’ records and related documents that list passengers, dates and routes for Epstein’s jets; parts of those logs were entered into evidence at the Ghislaine Maxwell trial and have been published or leaked in several batches, including releases by the Department of Justice and archived unredacted PDFs [4] [5]. Pilots who testified at Maxwell’s trial explained how entries were made—sometimes with initials, first names or placeholders like “one female”—which affects how precisely a name on a page can be read or interpreted [4].
2. High‑profile names that recurrently appear in reporting
Multiple mainstream reports and aggregations list recurring high‑profile figures in the logs: former President Bill Clinton is widely reported to appear many times, and Donald Trump appears on logs from the 1990s [1] [2] [3]. Other frequently cited names include Prince Andrew, Naomi Campbell, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Alan Dershowitz, Larry Summers and Ghislaine Maxwell herself [1] [3] [6].
3. Specific examples cited in reporting
Reporting and the unredacted logs give concrete examples: Clinton reportedly flew on Epstein’s jet dozens of times to international destinations in the early 2000s, and a 2002 flight to Africa with Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker is often referenced [1]. Prince Andrew is named in flight entries at least twice in the 1990s, and violinist Itzhak Perlman appears in logs documenting trips to Michigan in 1992–1993, with pilots testifying they transported Perlman for the Interlochen arts camp [4] [1].
4. Variation and limits in the sources and entries
The format of the logs and past pilot testimony introduce ambiguity: entries use initials, nicknames or generic placeholders, and pages were signed by pilots who said they did not always record full names—sometimes noting “one female” when not told the name—so presence on a page can be ambiguous without corroborating evidence [4]. The Department of Justice releases and media lists are often condensed or redacted, and jump from raw names to headlines that may overstate what the logs directly establish [3] [5].
5. What appearing on a flight log does and does not prove
News outlets and the Department of Justice releases repeatedly emphasize that being listed in a log is a record of travel, not proof of criminal conduct; for example, some coverage explicitly states that appearing in the files “does not imply complicity or any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes at the time” [7]. Sources also show that the logs have been used as investigative leads or corroborating material rather than standalone proof [4] [5].
6. How media and public narratives diverge
Media summaries and aggregated lists (some from local outlets or aggregators) sometimes present long rosters of “names linked to Epstein,” which can blur distinctions between confirmed, ambiguous or common‑name entries; different outlets emphasize different names—some stress political figures like Clinton and Trump, others highlight entertainers and businesspeople—so readers should note editorial choices and that some outlets recycle previously published names without new corroboration [8] [9] [10].
7. Where to find the primary material and verify details
Primary materials include archived unredacted PDFs of the logs and official DOJ releases; researchers can consult the archive copies referenced in reporting to see the entries in context and pagination [5] [3]. Court testimony—such as pilot testimony at the Maxwell trial—provides crucial interpretive context for how entries were created and signed [4].
8. Practical takeaway for readers and researchers
Treat names in Epstein’s flight logs as an evidentiary starting point: they document travel but require context—dates, corroborating testimony, and corroborative documents—to establish relationships or wrongdoing. Cross‑check any headline claim against the primary log pages and the pilots’ trial testimony before drawing conclusions [4] [5].
Limitations: available sources do not mention every person who may appear in the complete 21‑year record; the lists compiled by various outlets vary in scope and redaction [5] [3].