What proportion of sexual assaults are perpetrated by women according to victimization studies?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Victimization surveys and research reviews show female-perpetrated sexual assault is a minority of total cases but not negligible: studies estimate female perpetrators account for roughly 5–20% of child sexual abuse [1] and federal and survey data have revealed substantial—though smaller—shares of female-perpetrated adult sexual victimization in some samples [2]. Major U.S. surveys and advocacy summaries continue to report that the overwhelming majority of sexual-assault victims are female and most perpetrators are male (e.g., 91% of victims are female; perpetrators are overwhelmingly male in many datasets) [3] [4].
1. What the large victimization studies report: men as the dominant perpetrator
National-level summaries and victimization reporting consistently portray sexual assault as overwhelmingly male-perpetrated. For example, the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey and related compilations indicate most victims of rape and sexual assault are female and that males comprise the large majority of identified perpetrators [3] [4]. RAINN and other U.S. organizations likewise emphasize that most victims are female and that victims usually know their attacker [5] [6]. Those high-level figures frame the dominant public-health and criminal-justice understanding.
2. Where women appear in the numbers: child abuse and some survey measures
Specialized literature and reviews place female perpetration at appreciable but minority levels in child sexual abuse: systematic reviews report that between about 5% and 20% of child sexual abuse is perpetrated by females [1]. That range reflects many empirical studies and marks child-focused samples as where female offending is most represented in the literature [1]. Reviews focused on female-perpetrated sexual victimization also highlight that female perpetrators often act alone and are known to victims [7].
3. Methodology drives variation: definitions, samples, and measurement
Estimates vary because studies use different definitions (e.g., “made to penetrate,” “rape,” “sexual contact”), different sampling frames (national surveys, clinical samples, prison populations, college surveys), and different age ranges (child vs. adult victims). RAND’s review emphasizes wide variation in definitions and study scope across perpetrator research [8]. That methodological heterogeneity explains why some studies and secondary analyses surface higher female-perpetration percentages while national aggregates emphasize male perpetration [8].
4. Counterparadigms and undercounting of nontraditional victim-perpetrator pairs
Researchers warn that relying on a male-perpetrator/female-victim paradigm limits recognition of other patterns, including male victims and female perpetrators. Analyses of male victimization show that categorization and survey wording can exclude some forms of male victimization or record them differently (e.g., “made to penetrate” versus “rape”), which affects how female-perpetrated acts are counted [9]. ScienceDirect summaries argue that federal data reveal a “surprising prevalence” of female-perpetrated sexual victimization once broader measures are considered [2].
5. Where researchers and advocates disagree
Some academic reviews call for rethinking stereotypes because certain studies—especially those using victim-sensitive surveys—find higher self-reported rates of female perpetration [2] [9]. By contrast, advocacy and national statistics emphasize the preponderance of male perpetrators and female victims to guide prevention and survivor services [3] [5]. Both positions coexist in the literature: one stresses dominant population patterns and service implications, the other stresses the importance of capturing counterparadigmatic abuse and measurement nuance [2] [9].
6. Practical takeaways for readers and policymakers
The evidence supports three concrete points: female-perpetrated sexual assault exists and in child-abuse literature accounts for roughly 5–20% of cases [1]; at the population level most sexual-assault victims and perpetrators recorded in major U.S. datasets are female victims and male perpetrators [3] [4]; estimates depend on definitions and survey methods, so policy, clinical screening, and prevention should use inclusive measures that capture nontraditional victim–perpetrator constellations [8] [9].
Limitations and transparency: available sources do not mention a single definitive proportion of female-perpetrated sexual assaults across all victimization studies because estimates differ by age group, definition, and sample (not found in current reporting). The best-supported numeric ranges from the provided literature are 5–20% for female-perpetrated child sexual abuse [1] and broader federal/survey evidence that most sexual assault is perpetrated by males [3] [4].