What proportion of online-speech arrests in the UK result in prosecution or conviction?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Roughly one in ten arrests for offensive online communications in the UK proceed to conviction: government-linked figures show about 12,000 arrests per year in the 2021–23 period and roughly 1,119 sentencings, meaning fewer than 10% of those arrested were convicted and sentenced [1] [2]. Reporting and parliamentary debate stress the trend — arrests up since the pandemic while convictions and sentencings have fallen over the past decade — but also underline gaps and caveats in the data [3] [4].
1. The headline numbers: arrests versus convictions
Custody data obtained and reported in major coverage indicate British police made about 12,000 arrests a year for online communications offences between 2021 and 2023, and parliamentary figures state that of those arrested fewer than 10% — around 1,119 people — were convicted and sentenced, framing a stark gap between detention and ultimate legal sanction [1] [2].
2. What the statistics actually cover — and what they don’t
Most coverage is focused on prosecutions under communications offences such as section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 and section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, which criminalise sending indecent or “grossly offensive” messages; the patterns described in reporting therefore primarily apply to those sections rather than to every online-related arrest [3] [4]. Several reporting outlets and civil society commentators warn forces reported differently, some forces did not supply data (including Police Scotland) and some FOI returns were incomplete, so the true national totals and the denominator for calculating prosecution rates may be higher or more uncertain than headlines imply [4] [5].
3. Explaining the low conviction rate: possible mechanisms
Observers and official actors point to multiple, overlapping reasons for the low conversion of arrest into conviction: Crown Prosecution Service guidance urging prosecutions for offensive social media messages only in “extreme circumstances,” the use of out‑of‑court disposals or no further action in many cases, and long court backlogs that keep matters from proceeding quickly to trial — all of which can reduce recorded convictions even when arrests occur [4] [2] [5]. Parliamentary debate explicitly noted court listing delays stretching years and suggested those delays and a drop in sentencings raise questions about arrest criteria [2].
4. The competing narratives: over-policing vs. necessary enforcement
Civil liberties groups and free-speech advocates characterise the disparity as evidence of over‑policing and chilling effects on expression, arguing that arrest is being used as deterrent rather than as a gateway to legitimate prosecution [4] [1]. Conversely, police forces defend that the relevant statutory sections capture a range of communications — including serious domestic-abuse‑related messages — and that custody data therefore reflects investigations into potentially harmful conduct as well as more marginal expressions [3]. The reporting shows both perspectives are present in the record and that different stakeholders read the same numbers to support opposite conclusions [3] [4].
5. What can’t be answered from existing reporting
The sources collectively make clear that the proportion of arrests that become prosecutions or convictions is low (fewer than 10% convicted and sentenced), but they do not provide a complete, force‑by‑force breakdown of why individual cases were dropped, diverted, or otherwise resolved without conviction; nor do they establish the exact number of prosecutions initiated versus convictions obtained across every police force because of incomplete FOI returns [2] [4]. Therefore, while the best available reporting supports the headline figure — roughly one conviction per ten arrests for the communications offences discussed — granular causal accounting for each arrest-to-no‑conviction outcome is not available in the cited material [2] [4].
6. Bottom line and implications
The current published and parliamentary record supports a clear answer: a small minority of online‑speech arrests under the communications statutes end in conviction — fewer than 10% by the cited figures — a gap that has prompted debates about proportionality, policing practices and statutory clarity even as police warn that the covered offences can include serious harms [2] [3] [4]. Any policy or public conclusion should acknowledge both the numerical reality in the sources and the reporting limits that make it impossible to trace every arrest’s pathway to prosecution or non‑prosecution from the available data [2] [4].