Have any prosecutors brought criminal charges against Donald Trump related to sexual abuse of minors?

1. No criminal charges for child sexual abuse are listed in major case trackers

Extensive public tracking of criminal cases against Donald Trump—by outlets and organizations summarizing his indictments and prosecutions—lists multiple criminal matters (New York falsified business records, federal election and documents prosecutions, Fulton County matters), but these summaries and timelines do not include prosecutors charging him with criminal sexual abuse of minors ^{[4] [5] [1] [6]}.

2. Civil claims and other sexual-allegation coverage exist, but they are distinct from criminal child-abuse charges

Reporting notes a high-profile civil/personal claim: a jury found Trump liable to E. Jean Carroll for sexual abuse in a civil context (referenced in fact-checking and media coverage cited by Snopes), but that is a separate civil-sexual-assault matter and not the same as criminal prosecutions for sexual abuse of minors; available sources emphasize that such civil findings and other accusations are different from criminal indictments alleging child sex crimes ^{[7] [1]}.

3. Fact-checkers and debunking outlets scrutinize online claims about settlements involving minors

PolitiFact examined a circulated list claiming Trump made settlements tied to “child sex crimes” involving 10- to 13-year-olds and found no evidence to support those specific settlement claims; it concluded there was no proof for that list’s assertions ^[3]. This undercuts viral social-media assertions that have been presented as suggesting criminal or civil liability for child sexual abuse.

4. Reporting of other sexual-crime-related news involves different people or contexts

Newsweek and other sources referenced individuals pardoned by Trump or otherwise tied into broader controversies who later faced sexual-offense charges (for example, people pardoned and later arrested on child-sexual-abuse-related charges), but those stories concern other defendants, not prosecutors charging Donald Trump himself with sexual abuse of minors ^[8]. The sources make a clear distinction between charges against others and the subject of reporting on Trump.

5. Limits of the available reporting and what is not found

Available sources do not mention any prosecutor having filed criminal charges against Trump alleging sexual abuse of minors; they also do not show verified settlements admitting such conduct involving minors ^{[3] [1]}. If prosecutions or new, verifiable allegations were filed after the coverage in these sources, those developments are not reflected here—available sources do not mention any such subsequent filings ^{[4] [5]}.

6. Competing narratives and potential misinformation to watch for

There are two competing currents in public discourse: one of confirmed criminal indictments on non-sexual-child matters tracked by Reuters, Lawfare, Ballotpedia and others (New York falsified records, federal election and classified-docs cases), and a second of social-media claims and conspiracy-oriented lists alleging child-sex crimes or secret settlements. Fact-checkers like PolitiFact and Snopes have debunked or flagged many of those child-related claims as unproven or based on dubious sourcing ^{[3] [7]}. Readers should treat viral lists or images alleging criminal child-sex offenses with skepticism until corroborated by primary court filings or reputable news outlets.

7. What authoritative sources would look like if the situation changed

A credible criminal charge would appear in court dockets and be reported by major news organizations and trackers cited here (Reuters, Lawfare, Ballotpedia, Wikipedia summaries and major fact-checkers). In the absence of such records in the sources assembled, the responsible conclusion—based on available reporting—is that no prosecutor has brought criminal charges against Donald Trump for sexual abuse of minors ^{[2] [9]}.

If you want, I can pull excerpts from the specific fact-checks and case-tracker pages above (PolitiFact’s analysis, Reuters’ summary of criminal cases, Lawfare’s trial coverage) to show the exact language they use when distinguishing the documented indictments from the unproven child-sex claims ^{[3] [2] [9]}.