Are there court, military, or CPS records publicly linked to the individuals named in the Substack audio timeline?
Executive summary
The Substack audio timeline publication asserts that supporting records exist and were shared with law enforcement and allies, but in the reporting provided there are no publicly linked court, military, or Child Protective Services (CPS) records that can be independently verified [1]. Substack’s platform features make it straightforward to publish audio and autogenerated transcripts [2] [3] [4], yet none of the sources here supply or point to official public records connecting named individuals to court‑martials, military personnel files, or CPS case files [1] [5].
1. What the Substack author claims and what the post actually shows
The Substack post at the center of this question presents first‑person audio and written claims that “records detail the court‑martial of a soldier” and that copies of recordings and supporting documents were distributed to police and allies in multiple countries [1]. The post repeatedly asserts possession of corroborating materials and says some documents were “stored with local police” and “provided initial corroborative documents to individuals and offices who have sworn oaths to help the innocent” [1]. Those are author statements about provenance and distribution, but the available reporting does not embed or link to specific court dockets, redacted military case files, or CPS records to substantiate those assertions [1].
2. What the platform makes possible — and why that matters for verification
Substack supports native audio and video publishing and offers auto‑generated transcripts and full‑screen transcript display for audio posts, which lowers the barrier to publishing detailed timelines and text versions of audio narratives [2] [3] [4]. That technical capability explains how an author can present an “audio timeline” and searchable transcript to readers quickly [2] [3]. It does not, however, equate to the presence of independent public records; platform tools facilitate dissemination but do not serve as proof that official court, military, or CPS records have been posted or are publicly linked [3] [4].
3. Official channels and public records: expectations versus what’s shown
Public, verifiable court or military records would normally be traceable through court docket systems, military justice public release channels, or government record disclosures; similarly, CPS records are typically confidential and released only in limited circumstances, sometimes via FOIA or subject access requests [5]. The reporting provided includes a discussion of FOIA mechanics and public release of records in other contexts but does not produce an actual FOIA release or identify a specific docket number, redacted military judgment, or CPS file associated with the individuals named in the Substack audio [5]. Thus the expectation of how one would verify such claims exists in the sources, but the concrete links or identifiers needed for independent confirmation are absent [5].
4. Alternate explanations, agendas, and the limits of available reporting
The author’s repeated assertions that records were “securely distributed to police” and “stored with local police and various other allies” could reflect genuine disclosure to authorities, strategic withholding by the author for safety reasons, or rhetorical framing intended to increase credibility; the sources do not settle which [1]. Substack’s history as a platform that hosts controversial and sometimes conspiratorial material also means readers should seek independent verification rather than assuming platform publication equals evidentiary availability [6]. Reporting here does not include any independent law‑enforcement confirmation or links to official public records, and therefore cannot corroborate the author’s claims beyond the author’s own statements [1] [6].
5. Bottom line: what can be stated with confidence from the provided reporting
Based solely on the documents and reporting supplied, there are no publicly linked court, military, or CPS records tied to the named individuals in the Substack audio timeline that can be independently verified; the Substack post makes strong claims of supporting records and distribution to authorities, and Substack’s tools enable easy publication and transcription, but the reporting contains no direct links, docket numbers, or released official files to confirm those claims [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. If official records exist and were released under FOIA or other channels, those releases are not included in the materials provided here and thus remain unconfirmed in this review [5].