Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which public records, flight logs, or legal filings include names linked to Epstein's private island?
Executive summary
Public records and legal materials that have included names tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s Little St. James island include flight logs and manifests, DOJ and House Oversight releases, and estate documents released by congressional Democrats; major releases have contained thousands of pages including flight logs and contact lists but with heavy redactions and disputed completeness [1] [2] [3].
1. Flight logs and manifests — the most concrete public lists
Flight logs and passenger manifests produced in court and by agencies are the clearest public records that list names associated with Epstein’s travel network; unredacted flight manifests were entered into evidence at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial and DOJ and other public releases have included flight logs previously released or compiled by news outlets, yielding named passengers such as Prince Andrew and repeated appearances of some public figures [4] [5] [6].
2. Department of Justice disclosures and the “first phase” release
The Justice Department’s February 2025 “first phase” declassification made more than 100 pages public and included flight logs, a redacted contact book, a masseuse list and evidence lists; Attorney General Pamela Bondi framed that release as shedding light on Epstein’s network, though she and DOJ acknowledged the set was only an initial tranche and heavily redacted [1] [7].
3. Congressional releases — Oversight Committee and Oversight Democrats
The House Oversight Committee and Oversight Democrats have released large batches of estate material and emails from Epstein’s accounts: Republicans released more than 33,000 pages at one point and the House committee published additional estate documents (20,000 pages), while Democrats have posted flight logs, manifests and schedules from the estate that reference high‑profile individuals [2] [8] [6].
4. Customs, FAA and CBP records — travel to the island
U.S. Customs and Border Protection records and FAA-derived flight records have been sources for travel to Little St. James; CBP has a FOIA page for Epstein records and earlier FAA disclosures (including an inadvertent production) expanded searchable flight histories used by newsrooms to track trips to the U.S. Virgin Islands [9] [10].
5. Media compilations and investigative datasets
News organizations and independent projects compiled flight manifests, FAA data and leaked logs into searchable datasets that include thousands of flights and named passengers; Business Insider and other outlets combined public filings and signal data to produce nearly 2,600 flight entries tied to Epstein’s fleet, which journalists then used to trace visits and name individuals [11] [5].
6. What the records show — named individuals and limits
Published flight logs and estate documents have included names often previously reported (e.g., Prince Andrew) and references to other public figures; recent email batches released by the House committee mentioned names such as Larry Summers and Steve Bannon, while some items (like Clinton’s presence on the island) are contested in the documents themselves — Epstein wrote in an email denying Clinton visited Little St. James [12] [13] [14].
7. Redactions, missing context and disputed interpretations
All principal releases contain heavy redactions and incomplete context: DOJ’s declassification and multiple congressional releases left large gaps, and officials and journalists note that the documents often “contain little new information” or are open to competing interpretations — the Justice Department has also said some materials cannot be released because they include images of minors [7] [2] [15].
8. Political uses and competing narratives
The release process has become political: Republicans and Democrats have both leveraged batches of records to press rival claims about who is implicated, and some political figures have urged public release or denounced it as selective; right‑wing influencers and QAnon adherents have used pieces of the files to push broader conspiracy narratives even as mainstream outlets urge caution about drawing conclusions from redacted logs [16] [17] [14].
9. How to evaluate named‑person references in the records
A name appearing in a flight log or estate email is evidence of presence on an aircraft or in correspondence, but it is not proof of criminal conduct by that person or proof they visited the island itself; multiple sources and contemporaneous official records (e.g., Secret Service logs, passports, corroborating schedules) are needed to establish destination and purpose — reporting on the files often distinguishes travel records from allegations of wrongdoing [4] [6] [3].
10. Bottom line for researchers and the public
The public record that best lists names connected to Epstein’s island consists of flight manifests, FAA/CBP travel records, DOJ declassified files and estate documents released by Congress; those records contain many names but are heavily redacted, incomplete, politically contested and do not by themselves establish criminal conduct — anyone using them must note limits, rely on multiple corroborating sources, and avoid equating presence on a flight manifest with guilt [5] [2] [7].
Sources cited above are the primary materials in current public reporting and official releases; available sources do not mention any single, full unredacted “island visitor list” published by a neutral authority that definitively ties every named individual to Little St. James beyond entries in flight logs, schedules, or email references [5] [8].