How do rates of homicide perpetrators compare when adjusted for population by race?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
When homicide rates are adjusted for population, Black and American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) males — especially those aged roughly 15–44 — show the highest per‑capita homicide rates in national data through 2019 (GBD/JAMA Network Open) [1] [2]. Multiple federal and secondary sources also report that Black homicide victimization rates in recent years have been several times higher than White rates (for example, 26.6 per 100,000 vs. 3.9 per 100,000 in a 2023 summary) [3].
1. What “adjusted for population” means and why it matters
Comparing raw counts of perpetrators or victims across racial groups misleads because groups differ in size; per‑capita rates (for example, homicides per 100,000 people) reveal risk more accurately. Publicly available research uses death certificates and population estimates to compute homicide rates per 100,000 — the standard approach used by the Global Burden of Disease team and national statistics offices [1] [2].
2. The headline pattern in recent, peer‑reviewed work
A 2000–2019 cross‑sectional study in JAMA Network Open (GBD US Health Disparities Collaborators) found “substantial variation” by county, race/ethnicity, sex, and age, and identified AIAN and Black males aged 15–44 as having the highest homicide rates nationally [1] [2]. That study used validated small‑area estimation models on National Vital Statistics System death records and NCHS population estimates [1].
3. National figures reported by federal and advocacy sources
Federal data summaries and advocacy analyses corroborate large disparities: the Violence Policy Center reported a Black homicide victimization rate of 26.6 per 100,000 in 2023, nearly four times the national rate (7.1) and roughly seven times the White rate (3.9) [3]. The Bureau of Justice Statistics’ 2023 report on homicide victimization provides complementary, recent national estimates and methodological detail [4].
4. How much higher are rates for some groups?
Different data series produce different multipliers, but multiple sources show large gaps. Secondary compilations and analyses cite Black per‑capita victimization and offending rates many times those of Whites — for example, widely cited summaries have historically shown Black offending or victimization rates several‑fold higher than White rates [5] [6] [3]. Exact multipliers vary by year, age group, and whether one looks at victims or offenders [5] [6].
5. Intrarracial dynamics and what that implies
Most homicides are intraracial — victims and perpetrators often share race — so higher victimization rates in a group tend to correspond with higher offending rates within that same group [6] [5]. Reasoned analyses of FBI data have shown that even when raw counts are similar across groups, per‑capita rates can differ sharply because of population size differences [6].
6. Geographic concentration and age/sex modifiers
The GBD study emphasizes county variation: racial disparities are not uniform across space — concentrated violence in particular counties and neighborhoods drives much of the national disparity [1] [2]. Age and sex strongly modify risk: males and younger adults—particularly aged roughly 15–44—carry the highest homicide rates within higher‑risk racial groups [1] [2].
7. Caveats, data limits, and contested interpretations
Data limitations include reporting gaps (race/ethnicity misclassification on death certificates or arrest files), differing denominators, and variation across data systems (NVSS, FBI UCR/NIBRS, BJS surveys) that yield different estimates [1] [5] [4]. Advocacy and partisan outlets sometimes present differing multipliers and emphases: some summaries stress victimization rates (for example VPC) while others focus on arrest ratios or historical trends [5] [3]. Available sources do not mention post‑2019 GBD estimates or every single 2024–2025 provisional figure; those updates would change precise numbers [1].
8. What competing explanations do sources offer?
Scholarly work cited in the sources points to structural factors (segregation, concentrated disadvantage) and age/sex composition as key drivers; some researchers argue socioeconomic context explains much of the racial gap, while others emphasize policing, reporting, and criminal‑justice processing differences as part of the story [5] [7]. Media and advocacy summaries often use the differences to argue for either targeted violence‑prevention and social investment or for law‑enforcement‑centered responses — the data support both policy discussions but do not single out one remedy [5] [8].
9. Bottom line for readers and policymakers
When adjusted for population, homicide rates differ sharply by race, with Black and AIAN males—especially young adults—experiencing the highest per‑capita rates in national studies through 2019 and summaries of 2023 data indicating Black victimization rates many times higher than White rates [1] [2] [3]. Policy responses must reckon with geographic concentration, age/sex patterns, and structural drivers; sources disagree on emphasis and solutions, and data limitations mean precise multipliers vary by dataset and year [1] [5] [4].