A 29-year-old Afghan named Rahmanullah Lakanwal committed a shooting at the White House
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Rahmanullah Lakanwal, a 29‑year‑old Afghan national who entered the U.S. under Operation Allies Welcome in 2021, has been identified by multiple outlets as the suspect accused of shooting two National Guard members near the White House; authorities say he faces charges including first‑degree murder [1] [2]. Reporting shows he previously worked with U.S. partners in Afghanistan, was living in Bellingham, Washington, with his family, and that investigators have seized electronic devices and interviewed relatives as they probe motive [3] [1] [4].
1. Who is the accused — a quick dossier
News organizations describe Lakanwal as a 29‑year‑old Afghan who arrived in September 2021 under Operation Allies Welcome and resettled in Washington state with his wife and five children; U.S. officials and media identify him as the person who allegedly shot two National Guard members near the White House [1] [5] [6]. He has been publicly linked to work with U.S. government‑backed units in Afghanistan — including CIA‑supported partner forces — though details and timelines vary across outlets [3] [7].
2. Charges, court status and official actions
District reporting indicates Lakanwal has been charged with serious crimes, including first‑degree murder, assault with intent to kill and illegal possession of a firearm, and he pled not guilty during a court appearance where he joined remotely with an interpreter [2]. Federal and local law‑enforcement officials have described an ongoing investigation; the FBI has seized numerous electronic devices from his residence and interviewed relatives as part of the probe [4].
3. What authorities say about his background
Multiple sources report Lakanwal worked alongside U.S. forces or with CIA‑backed local units in Afghanistan before coming to the United States, including service that drew the attention of U.S. intelligence and personnel who vouched to media about his role [1] [3] [7]. Reuters and BBC note U.S. officials and intelligence figures confirmed prior ties to U.S. operations without providing full operational detail [4] [7].
4. Possible motives and personal circumstances reported
At least two longform outlets describe Lakanwal as having struggled with social isolation, language barriers and mental‑health or personal crises after resettlement; community members and emails obtained by The Associated Press portray a man who had “not been functional” at times and who withdrew from community supports, while authorities have said motive remains under investigation [8] [9] [10]. Available sources do not present a definitive, confirmed motive; news organizations stress investigators are still probing [8] [9].
5. How reporting differs across outlets — points of disagreement
Mainstream outlets (Reuters, NPR, AP, BBC, Washington Post, CNN) broadly align on identification, resettlement history and that he had ties to U.S. partners in Afghanistan, but they emphasize investigative caution and evolving details [1] [9] [8] [7] [11] [12]. Some partisan and opinion‑leaning outlets and commentators stress immigration status or claim lapses in vetting — claims that vary in sourcing and are not uniformly confirmed by independent reporting in the files provided [13] [3]. Where outlets attribute specific immigration outcomes (for example, asylum approval dates or status expiration), dates and administrative labels differ across reports [5] [4] [13] [14].
6. Political and social fallout noted in coverage
Coverage records immediate political reaction: the incident became a flashpoint for debates over immigration, resettlement and security policy, and President Trump’s administration responded with calls for additional National Guard deployments and stricter immigration measures, according to reporting [2] [4]. At the same time, community advocates and some reporters warn against painting entire refugee communities with the actions of one individual, noting those groups had been “vetted multiple times by multiple agencies” during evacuation and resettlement efforts [7].
7. Evidence and investigative posture — what’s actually in the public record
Publicly disclosed investigative actions include seizure of cellphones, laptops and tablets from Lakanwal’s residence and interviews with family members; authorities are treating motive as undetermined while pursuing electronic records and interviews [4]. Court filings and formal evidence beyond those seizures are not detailed in the sources provided here [4] [2].
8. Limits of available reporting and what to watch next
Current sources offer identification, charges and background claims but do not provide a full, court‑tested evidentiary narrative or a judicial determination of motive or guilt; they note the investigation is ongoing and reporting contains discrepancies on immigration timelines and some biographical details [2] [4] [1]. Future authoritative clarifications — indictments, prosecutors’ filings, unredacted investigative affidavits, or court testimony — will be decisive; those are not included in the material reviewed here (not found in current reporting).
Bottom line: multiple reputable outlets converge on the core facts that Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national who came to the U.S. in 2021 and had prior ties to U.S. partners in Afghanistan, has been charged in the November attack on two National Guard members near the White House, while investigators continue to examine motive and digital evidence [1] [2] [4].