Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are there recent developments in other women's lawsuits against Donald Trump for sexual assault?
Executive Summary
Recent developments center chiefly on E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits: juries have found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll, producing multi-million-dollar judgments that Trump is appealing and asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn. Beyond Carroll, reporting catalogs dozens of additional women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct across decades, but no comparably recent jury verdicts against Trump in other women’s civil suits are recorded in the provided sources [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Why E. Jean Carroll’s trials became the headline — verdicts, damages and legal posture that followed
The most concrete legal developments among the cases cited concern E. Jean Carroll, where juries returned findings that Trump sexually abused Carroll in the 1990s and defamed her later, resulting in separate damage awards — a $5 million award for sexual abuse and an $83.3 million award tied to defamation and related claims, often reported together as roughly $88.3 million — though the exact breakdown and appeals have complicated the final tally [2] [5]. These verdicts culminated from two civil trials; one established liability for sexual abuse and the other for defamatory statements made while Trump was president. Trump has appealed and challenged evidentiary rulings, framing the litigation as improper; that appeal posture drives much of the “recent developments” coverage [5] [4].
2. The Supreme Court move and the defense narrative — what Trump’s lawyers are arguing now
After the trial losses, Trump’s legal team sought higher-court review, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to vacate the jury’s finding that he sexually abused Carroll and defamed her, arguing evidentiary errors and characterizing Carroll’s claims as politically motivated. That legal strategy signals a shift from contesting facts at trial to attacking procedural and evidentiary determinations on appeal, which could either delay enforcement of judgments or, if accepted, narrow or undo parts of the verdicts [4]. The defense narrative emphasizes alleged trial improprieties and political context, a posture that appeals to supporters and shapes media framing, but it does not negate the underlying jury findings at trial unless higher courts rule otherwise [5] [4].
3. Wider catalog of accusations — dozens of women, but few parallel verdicts
Reporting compiled by outlets notes at least 26 women have publicly accused Trump of sexual misconduct dating back to the 1970s, creating a broader backdrop to Carroll’s cases and informing public debate and media coverage [1]. Despite the breadth of allegations, the sources supplied do not document comparable recent civil jury verdicts or final judgments against Trump from other plaintiffs that match the Carroll awards in legal finality or monetary consequence. The distinction between public accusation, civil litigation, and an enforceable judgment is central: many allegations exist, but recent, independently adjudicated verdicts besides Carroll are not evident in these documents [1] [6].
4. Conflicting framings — media summaries vs. legal-tracker perspectives
Different sources emphasize distinct facets: news summaries foreground the dramatic jury findings and the dollar figures [2], while legal trackers and broader timelines place those verdicts within a complex matrix of appeals, ongoing litigation, and related cases, noting status changes through 2025 such as continued appeals [3]. This divergence matters because headline figures can imply finality that the appellate process may alter. Readers should understand both the trial-level findings and their contingent nature while appeals proceed, which is precisely why legal-tracker updates and court filings through 2025 are essential context [2] [3].
5. What the timelines tell us — dates, verdicts, and the appellate sprint through 2024–2025
The timeline across sources shows key events from 2023 through mid-2025: jury findings and damages in 2023–2024, reporting of the $83.3 million and $5 million awards in early 2024, and appellate activity including a Supreme Court petition and ongoing appeals referenced in 2025 summaries [1] [2] [3] [4]. This sequence underscores that the Carroll litigation moved fastest to formal verdicts, while other accusations remain publicly reported or litigated without comparable recent trial conclusions. The appellate filings in 2024–2025 are the main locus for “recent developments,” as they determine whether trial verdicts become enforceable and final [2] [3].
6. Bottom line for readers — what is established and what remains in flux
What is established in the provided materials is that juries found Trump liable in E. Jean Carroll’s civil claims and large damage awards were entered, with appeals and a Supreme Court petition actively seeking to overturn or diminish those outcomes; those verdicts represent the most concrete recent legal developments in women’s lawsuits against Trump [2] [4]. What remains in flux is enforcement and final legal status pending appellate and possibly Supreme Court action, and the fact that, while many other women have accused Trump of misconduct, the sources do not show similarly recent, definitive civil verdicts against him outside the Carroll matters. Readers tracking this area should watch appellate dockets and legal-tracker updates through 2025 for definitive resolution [3] [1].