How have regional trends (e.g., Latin America, Africa, Asia) in deportations evolved from 2021 to 2025, and what data sources show these trends?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Deportations fell to historic lows in FY2021 and then rose sharply through FY2024–2025, with Latin America—especially Mexico and the Northern Triangle—accounting for the majority of removals; DHS/ICE releases, Migration Policy Institute analyses and media datasets document that shift [1] [2] [3]. Independent trackers and reporting show growing interior ICE arrests and expanded use of “voluntary departures” and third‑country transfers to Latin America, while African and Asian nationals increasingly appear in deportation flows but remain a smaller share [4] [5] [6].
1. The numbers: from the FY2021 trough to a rapid rebound
Government and research data show FY2021 produced unusually low deportation totals (a multi‑decade low noted in contemporaneous tracking), then a steady rise: Migration Policy Institute counted roughly 1.1 million deportations from FY2021 through early 2024 and documents rising annual removals into FY2024; ICE’s newly published FY‑to‑date dashboards through Dec. 31, 2024 provide the agency’s own arrest/removal tallies used by reporters and analysts [1] [2]. Media and NGO data releases and FOIA sets in 2025 then captured sharp increases in ICE interior arrests and removals as the new administration pushed to scale enforcement [4] [7].
2. Latin America: the dominant destination and target of policy
Multiple sources show Latin America remains the overwhelmingly dominant region for U.S. removals. MPI and other analysts report roughly 87% of interior removals in FY2021–24 went to Mexico and northern Central America, and reporting documents U.S. agreements that use Latin American countries as receivers or transit points for deportees from other continents [3] [6]. Country‑level tallies cited by data aggregators place Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Ecuador and Colombia among the top national recipients in 2025 [8] [9].
3. Asia and Africa: smaller but rising, and the “third‑country” dynamic
Coverage by AP, El País and Migration Policy shows an important trend: the U.S. increasingly routes migrants from Asia, Africa and other regions through Latin American partners rather than direct repatriation—effectively expanding deportation footprints without proportionally larger direct returns to those origin states [10] [6]. PBS and AP reporting document flights and hotel holds in Panama and Mexico for Asian and African nationals; analysts note these extracontinental removals remain numerically smaller than Latin American returns but are growing and politically sensitive [6] [11].
4. How the data are produced — and why figures diverge
DHS/ICE publish removal and detention dashboards (the ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations statistics and DHS monthly enforcement tables) that form the official baseline, but FOIA releases, independent trackers (Deportation Data Project, Mapping Deportations), and media archives are essential to fill gaps when DHS pauses routine publishing; those independent datasets reveal arrest surges and interior enforcement operations not always visible in headline DHS numbers [2] [12] [13] [14]. Analysts caution that “removals” and “returns” are counted differently (ICE removals vs. CBP returns), voluntary departures and self‑deportations are often included in administrations’ tallies, and changes in counting practices can make year‑to‑year comparisons misleading [15] [16].
5. Policy drivers and competing interpretations
Official messaging frames the rise as an operational response to high migration and a bid to deter new arrivals; DHS touted record removals and incentive programs in 2025 [17] [18]. Critics and many analysts argue the increases reflect a political priority to maximize removals through expanded interior arrests, detention, and incentivized voluntary departures—tools that can inflate “removal” counts while raising legal and humanitarian concerns [19] [5] [20]. Migration Policy Institute and civil‑society reports highlight the logistics and limits of deporting distant nationals, which explains why Latin America remains the easiest and largest target [3] [21].
6. Best sources to track regional trends through 2025
- ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations dashboards and DHS monthly enforcement tables for official removals, detention and alternatives metrics [2] [22].
- Migration Policy Institute analyses and country/region studies for interpreted totals and regional breakdowns [1] [3].
- Deportation Data Project and media FOIA analyses (e.g., Axios reporting, The Guardian) for granular arrest-level and field‑office data when DHS publication slows [13] [4] [14].
- AP, PBS, El País and investigative outlets for reporting on third‑country transfers, flights and bilateral agreements affecting non‑Latin American nationals [6] [10] [11].
7. Limitations and what reporting does not say
Available sources do not mention a single, consolidated international dataset that uniformly reconciles DHS removals, CBP returns, voluntary departures and self‑deportations across 2021–2025; analysts therefore rely on cross‑checking government dashboards, FOIA dumps and independent trackers to approximate regional shares [15] [12]. Country‑level precision for Africa and Asia flows is incomplete in public ICE aggregates; reporting documents cases and bilateral arrangements but does not yet produce a comprehensive, audited tally for extracontinental deportations [11] [6].
Bottom line: official and independent datasets agree on the arc — a plunge in FY2021, steady growth through FY2024 and a rapid enforcement surge in 2025 — with Latin America continuing to receive the bulk of removals while Asia and Africa remain smaller but visible parts of an expanded deportation strategy; researchers must combine ICE/DHS dashboards, MPI and FOIA‑based media datasets to follow the regional picture [2] [1] [13].