What other video angles and forensic evidence have been released in the Renée Good case?
Executive summary
Multiple video angles and some forensic commentary have emerged in the aftermath of the Jan. 7, 2026 fatal shooting of Renee Good, including cellphone footage shot by the ICE agent involved, multiple bystander videos from different vantage points, and side‑by‑side compilations used by local outlets and analysts; these clips have produced competing narratives about whether Good’s vehicle made contact with the agent and whether she intended to use it as a weapon, while prosecutors have asked the public to submit any additional recordings for review [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. What video angles have been published and circulated
News organizations and local stations have published several distinct video angles: the agent’s own cellphone recording of the immediate approach and shooting, multiple bystander cellphone videos that capture the vehicle’s movement and surrounding crowd from other directions, and compiled side‑by‑side footage produced by outlets to compare perspectives and timing; outlets including CBC, CNN, ABC7 and Fox9 have explicitly highlighted these multiple camera angles in their reporting [1] [2] [5] [3].
2. The agent’s phone video: new audio and framing
A newly released video filmed by the ICE officer shows his vantage point and contains audio of the crucial seconds before the shooting, and that recording has been foregrounded by CBC and other outlets as revealing both the officer’s actions and what he perceived, with CNN also noting that the agent pulled out his phone and filmed as he approached Good’s vehicle [1] [2].
3. Bystander footage and side‑by‑side comparisons complicate the timeline
Bystander cellphone videos show Good reversing and then steering away as voices shout “Drive!” in the moments before shots were fired, and media outlets have published side‑by‑side clips to highlight differences in what each camera captures; those visual juxtapositions have prompted differing interpretations about whether the car contacted the officer and about the sequence of motion immediately before the shooting [5] [3] [6].
4. Forensic commentary: experts point to posture, vehicle movement and training expectations
Independent forensic commentators and former law‑enforcement analysts have dissected the angles, focusing on body language, steering inputs, and whether the agent could have stepped aside rather than remain in the vehicle’s path; some forensic write‑ups argue Good appears to be attempting to leave rather than accelerate toward the officer, while others highlight that the agent reported being struck or dragged in prior related incidents — reporting that has fueled debate over how a “reasonable officer” standard should be applied [7] [8] [9].
5. Conflicting official narratives and requests for more evidence
Federal officials and some administration figures have characterized the incident as involving intent to use the SUV against officers, while local leaders and other observers have disputed that reading after viewing the footage; in parallel, the Hennepin County prosecutor publicly asked the public to send any video or other evidence to her office amid reporting that FBI control of physical evidence limited local access to some materials, a development flagged by multiple outlets as complicating local investigative efforts [10] [4] [9].
6. What the videos do — and do not — resolve so far
The assembled footage definitively shows the shooting itself and the immediate movements captured by several cameras, but it does not produce a single uncontested narrative: news organizations and fact‑checkers report uncertainty about whether Good’s car made contact with the agent, and analysts warn that more angles have both clarified certain moments and added “fog” that allows different viewers to reach opposing conclusions; prosecutors continue to solicit more recordings to fill gaps that public videos haven’t addressed [9] [6] [11] [4].