What other video and bodycam evidence has been released related to the Renee Good shooting and what do those sources show?
Executive summary
Multiple videos have circulated following the Jan. 7, 2026, killing of Renee Nicole Good, but the most consequential newly released clip is a 47‑second cellphone recording taken by the ICE agent who fired that shows his perspective and audio of the final moments; independent news analyses that synchronized that clip with other camera angles report it does not show the agent being run over, though officials and partisans interpret the imagery differently [1] [2] [3].
1. The catalogue of released footage and who published it
At least three categories of footage have been publicly discussed: bystander and scene videos that circulated immediately after the shooting, a clip published by Minnesota outlet Alpha News showing the officer’s handheld phone perspective, and other broadcast side‑by‑side compilations assembled by local TV and national outlets that stitch multiple angles together for comparison [2] [1] [4].
2. The agent’s 47‑second cellphone video: origin, verification and content
The 47‑second clip widely discussed was obtained and first published by Alpha News and later verified as authentic by outlets including CBC and the Department of Homeland Security; it shows Renee Good inside a maroon SUV as the agent approaches, includes audio of her saying “I’m not mad at you,” and captures the seconds when the officer fires three shots [2] [1] [5].
3. Mislabeling as “bodycam” footage and corrections
Several early reports and social posts described the newly circulated clip as body‑worn camera footage from the shooting officer, but media fact‑checks noted that the clip is a handheld phone recording from Jonathan Ross, not a bodycam, and flagged the mischaracterization to correct public understanding of perspective and framing [6].
4. What side‑by‑side compilations and video analyses show
Local stations and national outlets produced side‑by‑side videos comparing the agent’s phone clip with other camera angles and exterior bystander shots; those compilations help clarify the spatial relationship between the officer and the SUV, show the agent walking around the front of the vehicle with a phone visible in his left hand, and reveal the precise timing of the agent’s firing relative to the car’s movement [4] [1] [3].
5. Technical analyses: no visual evidence the agent was run over
A frame‑by‑frame analysis published by The New York Times, using synchronized clips, concluded the visual evidence “shows no indication that the agent who fired the shots … had been run over,” and its reconstruction focused on contested moments of escalation and the agent’s positioning relative to the SUV [3].
6. Official statements tied to the video and how they interpret it
The Department of Homeland Security asserted the cellphone footage corroborated its initial account that Good “was impeding law enforcement and weaponized her vehicle,” framing the shooting as an act of self‑defense by the officer; DHS officials and conservative politicians shared and cited the clip in support of that narrative [1] [5] [2].
7. Local officials, critics and the politics of framing the footage
Local leaders and critics disputed the federal interpretation, with Minneapolis officials saying they were being frozen out of the federal probe and some calling the administration’s characterization “garbage,” while media outlets and fact‑checkers pushed back on mislabeling and selective framings that could distort what the clip actually shows [2] [6].
8. Limits of the released visual record and outstanding questions
Available reporting documents multiple camera angles but also notes limitations: the released cellphone clip is brief, other relevant footage may exist but has not been made public, and investigative agencies have not released a comprehensive synchronized dataset to the public, so certain factual questions about intent, perceived threat, and exact physical contact remain subject to further review [1] [3].