What additional surveillance or squad‑car footage exists from the Renee Good scene and have authorities promised to release it?
Executive summary
A patchwork of videos has surfaced in the killing of Renée Nicole Good: a 47‑second cellphone clip recorded by the ICE officer who fired, longer surveillance angles obtained by outlets such as CNN and others, and multiple bystander clips that investigators and news organizations have synchronized to recreate the sequence of events [1] [2] [3]. Federal and local authorities have released some footage and urged the public to share recordings, but there is no single, public pledge that all surveillance or squad‑car video will be handed over in full to prosecutors or the public — federal control over evidence and limits on access to certain materials remain contested [4] [5] [6].
1. What footage is now public: officer cellphone, distant CCTV and bystander video
The most prominent new clip is a roughly 47‑second cellphone video that was published by Alpha News and carried by multiple outlets; it shows the encounter from the perspective of the ICE officer who later fired, and includes audio of the seconds before shots were fired [7] [1] [8]. In addition, news organizations have obtained surveillance‑style footage that captures a longer timeframe — CNN released a grainy, distant four‑minute angle showing the approach and movements around the vehicle, and other head‑on surveillance clips have been reported and used in synchronized timelines by news analysts like Bellingcat and The New York Times [2] [3] [9].
2. What other recordings reportedly exist: synchronized feeds, squad or vehicle cams unclear
Investigative reconstructions now rely on multiple feeds being synced — officer cellphone video, at least one head‑on surveillance camera, eyewitness smartphone clips and longer CCTV that shows several minutes leading up to the shooting — and analysts say additional angles may yet surface [3] [9] [2]. What remains unclear is whether any squad‑car or official vehicle dashcam footage exists or will be released publicly: DHS policy requires body‑worn cameras be activated during enforcement and retention for serious incidents, but DHS has not confirmed whether officers on scene were wearing body cams or whether squad‑car dashcams captured the encounter [5].
3. What authorities have released or promised so far
The Department of Homeland Security itself shared at least one “minutes‑before” video to media outlets, and federal officials have publicly confirmed the cellphone video was recorded by the agent who fired [4] [1]. At the local level, the Hennepin County prosecutor asked the public to submit any recordings to investigators and indicated a public portal would be posted for evidence submissions, signaling an active effort to gather community video though not an explicit promise to release every piece of official footage [5]. News reporting also notes that federal investigators seized Good’s vehicle and that state authorities have not been granted access to the vehicle or FBI forensic evaluations, which limits transparency around some physical and recorded evidence controlled by federal authorities [6].
4. Conflicting narratives, motives behind releases and gaps in disclosure
The staggered release of clips has fed competing narratives: conservative outlets that first published the officer’s cellphone footage framed it as corroboration of an officer’s account and were amplified by political figures, while local leaders and some journalists say the same footage contradicts claims that the agent was run over and therefore disputes the administration’s early framing [7] [9]. The choice by Alpha News to release the cellphone clip, and by DHS to provide selected minutes‑before video, suggests a selective disclosure strategy that advances particular narratives; independent analysts and prosecutors continue seeking more feeds to bridge gaps [1] [3] [5].
5. Bottom line: more angles exist but comprehensive release is not assured
Multiple additional angles — including cellphone footage from the shooting agent, distant CCTV capturing several minutes, and crowd‑shot videos that have been synchronized — are already public or in investigators’ hands, and officials have solicited public footage [1] [2] [3] [5]. However, there is no blanket, public commitment from federal authorities to release all surveillance, squad‑car, body‑worn camera or forensic footage to the public or to state investigators; federal control over key materials and unanswered questions about body‑cam usage mean transparency remains partial and contested [5] [6].