Was Reverend David Black shot with pepper balls while protesting ICE?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Video and multiple news outlets report that Rev. David Black was struck in the head and body by pepper-ball projectiles fired by federal agents during a Sept. 19, 2025, protest outside the Broadview ICE facility; outlets including CNN, WGN, Fox32 and People describe video showing an agent firing downward and a projectile hitting Black’s head [1] [2] [3] [4]. Black and supporting organizations (including the ACLU) have filed or joined legal action alleging excessive force; DHS officials publicly defended the officer involved, creating an official dispute over context and justification [2] [5].
1. What the footage and multiple news organizations show
Video widely circulated and described by CNN, WGN, Fox32 and others shows officers on a roof firing pepper balls into a crowd and one projectile striking Rev. David Black in the head, knocking him down; those outlets report the incident occurred Sept. 19 outside the Broadview ICE detention/processing center [1] [2] [3]. Eyewitness reporters and witnesses who recorded the moment told CNN and other outlets they saw an agent fire pepper balls down at the protesters and that one hit Black on the top of his head [1] [2].
2. Black’s account and reported injuries
Rev. Black has said he was praying when agents fired and that he was struck multiple times — reports say “at least seven times” on his head, face and body in some accounts — and that he experienced respiratory symptoms in the weeks following the incident [6] [7]. News articles quote Black describing being dazed, collapsing, and later joining a lawsuit supported by the ACLU alleging violations of First Amendment rights and unconstitutional use of force [8] [2].
3. Legal and advocacy response
The ACLU and plaintiffs have sought emergency court orders and filed litigation tied to the Broadview protests; coverage notes that Black is among plaintiffs seeking to prevent what they describe as illegal suppression of protesters’ rights [2]. Outlets reporting on the lawsuit frame the legal action as a challenge to how federal immigration enforcement responded to demonstrations, not merely an individual complaint [2].
4. DHS and official rebuttals
The Department of Homeland Security publicly defended the ICE officer’s actions in at least one reported instance, creating a clear official counterpoint to protesters’ and plaintiffs’ accounts [5]. The DHS defense means federal officials contest elements of the protesters’ framing; available reporting does not include a full DHS timeline or complete internal justification in the sources here beyond that defense [5].
5. Independent verification and fact-checking notes
Fact-checking and photo verification outlets such as Snopes confirm images and reporting that place Black at the scene and describe him being pepper-sprayed and hit by “pepper pellets,” and they note Black’s own confirmation that he was the person photographed and treated [9]. Multiple mainstream outlets corroborate the core facts: video exists, it shows an agent firing downward, and Black was hit [1] [2] [3] [4].
6. Points of dispute and what sources don’t settle
Key disputes in the coverage include why agents fired (whether to prevent vehicle movement or to control the crowd) and whether warnings or de‑escalation were given; Black denies ICE’s characterization that vehicles were leaving, calling such descriptions “categorically false” [10]. The provided sources do not include a complete official incident report, internal ICE body‑cam footage beyond the viral clips, or a final judicial ruling resolving the legal claims — those documents are not found in current reporting [10] [5].
7. Broader context and competing narratives
Coverage places this episode amid larger protests criticizing ICE’s practices and amid questions about the federal government’s handling of demonstrations; advocates emphasize religious freedom and First Amendment claims, while DHS framing centers on operational security and the propriety of the officer’s response [7] [5]. Media outlets range from straight news recitations of the video to advocacy-oriented pieces amplifying plaintiff claims; readers should note each outlet’s focus when weighing language like “shot” versus “struck by pepper balls” [2] [3] [11].
8. What to watch next
Follow-up items that would resolve outstanding disagreements include a full DHS/ICE incident report, any release of additional footage (body cams, rooftop feeds), medical records entered into litigation, and court rulings on the ACLU’s emergency and civil claims; those are not included in the sources provided here (available sources do not mention those documents) [2] [9]. For now, the convergent evidence in multiple videos and news reports establishes that Rev. David Black was struck by pepper-ball projectiles during the Broadview protest while federal officials offer a counter-narrative defended by DHS [1] [5].