What are the allegations against Roger Stone in the Mueller investigation?

1. The core allegations: lying to Congress, obstruction and witness tampering

Mueller’s indictment charged Stone with seven counts that fall into three categories: obstruction of an official proceeding, making false statements to Congress, and witness tampering. The special counsel’s office says those charges stem from Stone’s statements about his interactions with WikiLeaks and with the Trump campaign — specifically that he lied about communications and denied possessing records that would document those interactions ^{[1] [2]}.

2. The WikiLeaks connection that anchors the case

Prosecutors centered their case on Stone’s efforts in the weeks before the 2016 election to obtain and publicize stolen Democratic emails that WikiLeaks released — materials that Mueller’s office says were hacked by Russian intelligence. The indictment alleges Stone cultivated the impression he could serve as a conduit for inside information from WikiLeaks to the Trump campaign ^{[1] [4]}. News coverage noted Mueller’s team seized substantial electronic evidence from Stone’s accounts during the probe ^[5].

3. Specific misconduct prosecutors say Stone committed

According to reporting and the indictment, Stone made multiple false statements to the House Intelligence Committee about his communications with WikiLeaks, falsely denied possessing records documenting those interactions, and took actions intended to obstruct the investigation — including threats to discourage a witness from testifying, which prosecutors described as “Godfather-like” and even mentioning a witness’s therapy dog ^{[2] [1]}. Federal prosecutors argued those acts “undermined” the congressional inquiry ^[6].

4. Stone’s defense and public posture

Stone consistently pleaded not guilty and framed his indictment as politically motivated, calling the charges “process crimes” and denying he ever coordinated with WikiLeaks or the Russian government to obtain hacked emails ^{[7] [8]}. He publicly vowed not to “bear false witness” against President Trump and initially signaled he might cooperate only to clear his name, while disputing prosecutors’ characterizations ^{[8] [9]}.

5. Evidence prosecutors highlighted in court

Prosecutors pointed to documentary and electronic evidence, including texts and records they say contradict Stone’s testimony and show frequent contacts relevant to the probe — for example, reporting cited “30 text messages” showing communications on days Stone denied such contacts ^[10]. The government also noted the large volume of data seized from Stone’s iCloud and other accounts ^[5].

6. Trial outcomes, sentencing and political fallout (as reported)

Reporting documents that a jury convicted Stone on all seven counts in November 2019, and that his case and conviction became political flashpoints — including later actions by the president regarding his sentence ^{[11] [2]}. Coverage emphasized the trial’s role in answering lingering questions from Mueller’s investigation and in spotlighting campaign contacts about hacked emails ^[4].

7. Competing narratives and why they matter

Prosecutors portrayed Stone as actively trying to protect the campaign and obstruct oversight by lying and intimidating witnesses ^[6]. Stone and his defenders countered that these were memory lapses or politicized prosecutions and insisted the facts do not show collusion with Russia ^{[7] [8]}. Those conflicting accounts shaped how media and lawmakers interpreted Stone’s conduct and the broader inquiry ^[4].

8. Limitations in available reporting and unanswered questions

Available sources document the charges, the evidence prosecutors relied on, Stone’s denials, and the conviction; they do not, in the provided set, itemize every piece of trial testimony or provide the full indictment text for independent review here — readers seeking the primary documents should consult the indictment and court records directly ^{[2] [1]}. Multiple outlets stressed that Stone’s case reopened questions left by the Mueller report about campaign contacts and the release of hacked materials ^[4].

Conclusion: The Mueller team accused Roger Stone of orchestrating a campaign to obtain and exploit WikiLeaks’ releases and then lying and impeding investigators to conceal those efforts; Stone denied the allegations and characterized them as politically motivated, setting up a courtroom and public fight that media coverage treated as central to unresolved questions from the Russia probe ^{[1] [2] [4]}.