What actions legally qualify as war crimes under the Rome Statute?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The Rome Statute defines war crimes in Article 8 and through its Elements of Crimes to cover a wide range of conduct—intentionally killing or torturing protected persons, using child soldiers, directing attacks against civilians or civilian objects (including hospitals and schools), and employing prohibited weapons or methods of warfare [1] [2] [3]. The ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor and recent policies (e.g., on cyber-enabled acts and environmental damage) stress that Rome Statute crimes apply regardless of new technologies or means, and that war crimes can be prosecuted when committed as part of a plan, policy or large-scale commission [4] [5] [6] [3].
1. What the Rome Statute actually lists as “war crimes”
Article 8 of the Rome Statute and its accompanying Elements of Crimes enumerate specific acts that qualify as war crimes: unlawful killing, torture, inhuman treatment, taking hostages, intentionally directing attacks against civilians or civilian objects (such as hospitals, monuments, schools, places of worship), conscripting or enlisting children under 15 into armed forces, and employing weapons or methods of warfare that are inherently indiscriminate or cause superfluous injury—among others [1] [2] [3].
2. Scale and context matter: individual acts vs. systematic policies
The Court emphasizes jurisdiction “in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large‑scale commission of such crimes.” That means isolated illegal acts can be prosecuted, but the Statute and ICC practice pay special attention to patterns, state or organizational policy, and large-scale conduct [3] [1].
3. War crimes overlap with other core crimes the ICC prosecutes
The Rome Statute situates war crimes alongside genocide, crimes against humanity and aggression as the Court’s central mandates. Some conduct can be both a war crime and a crime against humanity (for example, mass murder in armed conflict), and the Statute and ICC materials treat these overlaps as central to prosecutorial strategy [1] [3].
4. New domains and modes: cyberspace and environmental damage
The ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor has clarified that the legal framework of the Rome Statute applies to acts conducted through new technologies. Its December 2025 Policy on Cyber‑Enabled Crimes states cyberspace is not beyond the Statute’s reach; cyber operations that amount to genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes or aggression can be investigated and prosecuted [4] [5]. Separately, the ICC has developed policy thinking on environmental damage as it may relate to Statute crimes [6].
5. How prohibited weapons and indiscriminate methods are handled
Article 8 explicitly criminalizes employing weapons, projectiles or methods of warfare that cause superfluous injury or are inherently indiscriminate, when those weapons are subject to comprehensive prohibition or otherwise breach international humanitarian law. The Statute contemplates amendments and annexes for adding prohibited weapons lists but already penalizes methods that violate the laws of armed conflict [2] [1].
6. Practical constraints: jurisdiction, state participation and politics
The Rome Statute’s reach depends on state party status and the ICC’s jurisdictional rules; not all states are parties and some have withdrawn or signalled withdrawal, affecting how and where the Court can act [7] [8]. Political pushback, sanctions, or refusal to cooperate with arrest warrants can limit enforcement even where the Statute clearly defines a war crime [9] [10].
7. Where sources are silent or limited
Available sources do not provide a line‑by‑line list of every sub‑paragraph of Article 8 in this briefing; for granular legal elements and the full enumerated list of war crime clauses one should consult the full Statute and Elements texts [1]. They also do not provide case law summaries here — not found in current reporting.
8. Competing viewpoints and implicit agendas to watch
States and commentators disagree on scope and enforcement: some governments (and affected political actors) accuse the ICC of overreach when investigations touch high officials, while ICC officials and rights groups stress universality and victim protection [9] [10]. Recent national moves to withdraw or challenge the Statute (e.g., Venezuela’s legislative steps and other states’ notifications) reflect political resistance that often masks domestic accountability concerns [8] [10].
Conclusion — The Rome Statute sets a comprehensive, evolving catalogue of war crimes centered on unlawful or indiscriminate attacks, abuses of protected persons, child recruitment and prohibited means of warfare, and the ICC treats cyber and environmental modalities as within reach of those provisions; enforcement, however, depends on jurisdictional mechanics, state cooperation and political realities [1] [2] [4] [6] [3].