Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the crime rates in the top 5 safest major cities in the US in 2025?
Executive Summary
The available 2025 listings disagree on which cities rank as the “top 5 safest,” and reported crime rates vary across compilations because publishers use different city samples and metrics. Two contemporaneous compilations place Weston, Newton, Johns Creek, Sammamish, and Fishers among the five safest and report per‑1,000 resident crime rates roughly between 0.64 and 7.02, while other lists name different small suburbs with near‑zero violent crime rates, exposing methodological differences and selective sample choice [1] [2].
1. Claim Extraction — What Precisely Is Being Asserted and Where the Numbers Come From
Multiple items claim a 2025 “top 5 safest” set; one source explicitly lists Weston, Newton, Johns Creek, Sammamish, and Fishers and attaches overall crime rates per 1,000 residents (4.24, 6.19, 0.64, 5.75, 6.73, 7.02 are reported across related summaries), attributing data to FBI and U.S. Census Bureau aggregates in its methodology [1]. Other outlets present alternative top‑safest lists — naming places like Campton Hills, Pingree Grove, Hawthorn Woods, Sagamore Hills, and Plainfield — and highlight near‑zero violent‑crime rates for those small suburbs, implying a different metric or narrower focus on violent crime versus combined crime [2].
2. Why Different Lists Give Different Top Fives — Methodology Explains the Discrepancy
The divergence stems from sample definitions and metric selection: one set appears to rate “major cities” or larger suburbanities and reports combined crime per 1,000 residents, while another emphasizes small municipalities with tiny populations and reports violent crime rates that often register as 0.0 per 1,000. The consequence is that rankings shift dramatically when small, low‑population suburbs are included versus when lists restrict to larger jurisdictions, creating conflicting headlines despite both using recent 2025 data [1] [2].
3. Comparing Reported Crime Rates — What the Numbers Actually Say
When comparing entries that report per‑1,000 figures, Weston is cited with 4.24 per 1,000, Newton near 6.19–6.39 per 1,000, Johns Creek extremely low at 0.64 per 1,000 in one summary, Sammamish around 6.73 per 1,000, and Fishers about 7.02 per 1,000, indicating variation across correlated summaries and possible transcription differences between outlets [1]. By contrast, the small‑town list reports violent crime rates of 0.0 or 0.1 per 1,000, which is attainable for places with very small populations where a single incident noticeably alters the rate [2].
4. Practical Implications — How Readers Should Interpret “Safest” Labels
“Safest” branding can mislead because combined crime rates, violent‑only rates, population thresholds, and time frames all materially change rankings. Large suburban cities with low overall incident counts can still register higher per‑1,000 rates than tiny villages reporting zero violent incidents in a single year. Consumers should therefore check whether a list measures violent crime versus property crime, whether it normalizes for population size, and which year or rolling average it uses before using rankings for relocation or policy judgments [1] [2].
5. Sources and Potential Agendas — Why the Differences Suggest Caution
Each source’s framing suggests different agendas: outlets focusing on major suburban and city markets emphasize broader livability and may cite FBI/Census aggregated metrics for comparability, while local or regional outlets highlight near‑zero violent crime in small towns, possibly to promote community image or attract residents. The repeated mention of FBI and Census inputs by one compiler signals an attempt at standardization, but the absence of uniform disclosure across all lists makes direct comparisons unreliable without a shared methodology [1] [2].
6. Recentness and Reliability — Dates and Cross‑Verification Matter
All cited lists are from mid to late 2025, with publication dates spanning June through August 2025; the clustered timing suggests they used the most recent FBI/Census releases or rolling annuals available then. Because different shops can synthesize the same raw datasets into distinct metrics, cross‑verification across multiple contemporaneous compilations is necessary to confirm any single city’s precise rate. Readers should prioritize sources that explicitly state their metric, population cutoffs, and basis in FBI/Census tables [1].
7. Bottom Line for Your Question — What Are the Crime Rates for the Named Top Five?
If you accept the compilation that lists Weston, Newton, Johns Creek, Sammamish, and Fishers as the top five, the reported overall crime rates hover between roughly 0.64 and 7.02 incidents per 1,000 residents, with Johns Creek notably low and Fishers toward the higher end of that band; these numbers reflect combined crime metrics as published in August 2025. However, alternate 2025 lists that include very small towns report near‑zero violent‑crime rates, demonstrating that the exact figures depend on which authoritative list and metric you select [1] [2].
If you want, I can reconcile a single, comparable table by applying one uniform definition (e.g., FBI reported crimes per 1,000 residents in 2024 calendar year) and list the exact 2025 published values for each candidate city.