Sascha Riley trafficked by Epstein
Executive summary
Sascha (also spelled Sasha or William “Sascha”) Riley is the named speaker in a set of viral audio recordings that allege he was trafficked as a child into networks tied to Jeffrey Epstein, claiming abuse between roughly ages nine and thirteen and naming high-profile figures; those recordings were widely distributed online but remain unverified by courts or mainstream investigations [1] [2] [3]. Journalistic reporting and the limited public record as of January 2026 show no independent corroboration in the unsealed Epstein-related documents and note inconsistencies and a lack of verification about Riley’s identity and the allegations [4] [5].
1. The core allegation: what the audio claims
The audio attributed to Riley recounts extreme childhood trafficking and exploitation, describing abuse from relatives in early childhood and then purported involvement in what the publisher frames as a Trump/Epstein criminal network between ages nine and thirteen; the clips explicitly name several political and judicial figures as participants in that alleged network [1] [2] [3].
2. Origin and spread of the recordings
The recordings—reported to be six unedited audio files released by Substack user Lisa Noelle Voldeng and shared across platforms like Threads, X and Substack—were recorded in phone interviews in July 2025 according to the publisher and quickly circulated online, generating intense public discussion and speculation [1] [5] [6].
3. Verification: what mainstream reporting and documents show (and don’t show)
Multiple outlets covering the viral material emphasize that the allegations in the tapes have not been authenticated by law enforcement or by established news organizations, and that none of the names Riley mentions have been tied to indictments, court rulings, or verified investigative findings stemming from the Epstein probes—or to the unsealed Department of Justice documents released in late 2025 and early 2026 [3] [2] [4].
4. Attempts to connect Riley to the public record
Efforts by commentators to find Riley in the newly unsealed Epstein files have not produced a clear match; reporting notes that William “Sascha” Riley does not appear as a notable or easily identifiable figure within those documents, though users have pointed to a “William ‘Bill’ Riley” mentioned in some released materials as a possible but unconfirmed connection—an interpretation the press warns is speculative [4].
5. Competing narratives and motives behind circulation
Proponents of the recordings present them as survivor testimony that demands investigation and point to claims of ongoing international inquiries, safety relocation, and willingness to undergo polygraph testing as signs of seriousness; critics and many news outlets counter that the rapid spread of unverified audio can amplify false or uncorroborated allegations and that public interest and political stakes create incentives for both amplification and discrediting [1] [3] [6].
6. Where reporting is limited and what would change the assessment
Public reporting to date documents the existence of the tapes and their claims but does not establish provenance, corroborating witnesses, documentary evidence, or law enforcement confirmation—so assertions that Riley was trafficked by Epstein remain allegations in the absence of independent verification; locating Riley in official case files, corroborating contemporaneous records, or a credible investigative body publicly substantiating the claims would materially alter this assessment [5] [4] [3].
7. Bottom line
The available, sourced reporting shows that Sascha Riley is the subject of serious and widely shared allegations of childhood trafficking tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s network, but every mainstream account and document review cited here concludes those claims are unverified as of January 2026; they should be treated as allegations pending corroboration by law enforcement, courts, or independent investigative journalism [1] [4] [3].