That the sex offenders per million is Biological women: 3 Biological men: 395 Trans women: 1,916
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The original statement claims that the number of sex offenders per million is 3 for biological women, 395 for biological men, and 1,916 for trans women [1]. However, upon reviewing the analyses, it appears that none of the sources provide direct evidence to support these specific numbers [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. The analyses do suggest that LGBTQ individuals are overrepresented on sex offender registries [1], and that men are more likely to commit violent crimes [5], which could be related to the claim about biological men having a higher rate of sex offenses. Additionally, transgender people are more likely to experience violent victimization [3] [4], which could be related to the claim about trans women having a higher rate of sex offenses.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key missing context is that the original statement does not provide any information about the sources or methodology used to obtain the numbers [1]. Additionally, the analyses suggest that LGBTQ individuals and transgender people experience higher rates of victimization and stressful experiences, which could be a contributing factor to their overrepresentation on sex offender registries [1] [3] [4]. Furthermore, the role of gender in crime statistics is complex and influenced by various factors, including societal and cultural norms [6]. It is also important to consider that the original statement only provides numbers for biological women, biological men, and trans women, but does not provide any information about other gender identities or expressions [1]. Alternative viewpoints could include considering the social and economic factors that contribute to crime rates, such as poverty, education, and employment opportunities [5].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading or biased because it does not provide any context or evidence to support the numbers [1]. Additionally, the statement only provides numbers for three specific groups, which may not be representative of the larger population [1]. The analyses suggest that LGBTQ individuals and transgender people are already marginalized and vulnerable groups, and presenting them as having higher rates of sex offenses without proper context or evidence could perpetuate harmful stereotypes and stigma [3] [4]. It is possible that the original statement is intended to promote a particular agenda or ideology, rather than providing an accurate and nuanced representation of the data [6]. Biological men may benefit from this framing as it distracts from their own high rates of sex offenses [5], while trans women may be harmed by this framing as it perpetuates harmful stereotypes and stigma [3] [4].