Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Details of Stacey Williams' 1993 groping allegation against Donald Trump
Executive summary
Stacey Williams, a former model who says she briefly dated Jeffrey Epstein, alleges that Donald Trump groped her at Trump Tower in early 1993 while Epstein watched and the two men "smiled at each other," an account Williams first gave publicly in October 2024 and later expanded in televised interviews [1] [2]. The allegation has been denied by a Trump spokesperson as "unequivocally false" and characterized by that spokesperson and some outlets as politically motivated; reporting shows Williams shared details on a Survivors for Kamala call and with outlets including The Guardian and CNN [2] [3] [4].
1. What Williams says happened — the core allegation
Williams recounts meeting Trump after Epstein introduced them, then months later being taken to Trump Tower where, she says, Trump "pulled her closer" and groped her — touching her breasts, waist and buttocks — while Epstein watched and the two men exchanged smiles, leaving her feeling "delivered" and part of a "twisted game" [2] [5] [6]. Williams has said she froze, felt confused and later broke off her relationship with Epstein; she has also shown a postcard she says Trump later sent that reads, "Stacey — Your home away from home. Love Donald" [2] [3].
2. How and when she made the allegation public
The fuller account surfaced in October 2024 during a Zoom call organized by Survivors for Kamala and in interviews with outlets including The Guardian and later CNN; outlets report she initially described parts of the story on social media previously but provided more detailed, on-record accounts at that time [2] [3] [4]. News organizations covered the allegation shortly before the 2024 presidential election, prompting both media profiles and political rebuttals [6] [7].
3. Denials, political framing and competing narratives
Trump’s campaign press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded by calling the accusations “unequivocally false” and suggested they were contrived by political opponents; some coverage notes Williams appeared on a call connected to groups supporting Kamala Harris, which the campaign cited as evidence of political motive while the Survivors for Kamala organizer said it was an independent gathering of survivors and advocates [2] [3] [7]. News outlets report these competing framings side-by-side: Williams’s detailed personal account versus the campaign’s categorical denial and allegation of timing and motive [6] [3].
4. Corroboration, contemporaneous evidence and reporting limits
Coverage cites Williams’s own testimony, friends who say she mentioned the incident years earlier, and the postcard she shared as supporting detail; however, available reporting in these pieces does not reference contemporaneous police reports or legal filings tied directly to this incident, and outlets note limitations of evidence beyond Williams’s account and the postcard [2] [5] [3]. Multiple outlets characterize the reporting as allegations rather than proven facts and note denials from Trump’s team [1] [6].
5. How outlets have presented the allegation and editorial choices
Major outlets (BBC, AP, Guardian, Variety, NPR) published descriptive accounts summarizing Williams’s claims, often including verbatim quotes about where Trump allegedly touched her, and uniformly carried the campaign denial; some pieces emphasized the timing ahead of the election, while others focused on Williams’s relationship with Epstein and the broader pattern of accusations against powerful men [1] [3] [2] [6] [8]. Video interviews later added on-camera testimony and additional friends’ confirmations in follow-up reporting [4] [9].
6. Context: Epstein, power dynamics and prior allegations against Trump
Reporting places Williams’s allegation in the larger context of Jeffrey Epstein’s later convictions and death and a long-running set of sexual-misconduct allegations involving Trump dating back decades; outlets note Epstein’s criminal record and Williams’s statement that the encounter felt orchestrated by the two men [5] [3] [10]. The coverage juxtaposes that context with the longstanding legal and political disputes surrounding Trump’s behavior, but does not present independent legal findings validating this specific 1993 incident in the cited stories [3] [2].
7. What the sources do not say / remaining questions
Available sources do not mention contemporaneous police reports, civil suits, or forensic evidence tied to the 1993 incident; they also do not present on-the-record confirmation from Epstein (deceased) or direct eyewitness testimony beyond Williams’s description and friends who say she told them years later [2] [5] [9]. Reporting leaves open questions about corroboration that would be required to move the claim from allegation to adjudicated fact [2] [3].
8. Bottom line for readers
The allegation is presented consistently across multiple mainstream outlets as a serious, detailed accusation from Stacey Williams supported by her testimony and some corroborating details (postcard, friends’ recollections), while Trump’s campaign has categorically denied the claim and framed its timing as politically motivated; coverage reflects those competing narratives and notes limits in contemporaneous corroborating evidence in the cited reporting [2] [3] [6].