What state-level ICAC annual reports provide counts of CyberTips and case outcomes for 2023–2024?
Executive summary
Two state-level documents in the supplied reporting explicitly surface counts tied to CyberTips for the 2023–2024 period: Tennessee’s ICAC Annual Report for 2024 and an Oregon Legislative Fiscal Office/DOJ document that cites calendar‑year 2023 CyberTip totals; however, comprehensive state-by-state annual reports with both CyberTip counts and detailed case outcomes were not broadly found in the provided sources [1] [2]. National ICAC program-wide figures and operational context exist in federal reporting and program pages, but those are not the same as discrete state annual reports [3].
1. Tennessee’s 2024 ICAC annual report does report activity and is the clearest state-level annual report located
Tennessee’s Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Annual Report 2024 is named as an annual ICAC report for the state and is the principal state-level document in the dataset that should contain counts and casework summaries for the reporting year [1]. The supplied metadata identifies it as the TBI ICAC Annual Report for 2024 (Tennessee Bureau of Investigation), indicating a state-produced annual summary of ICAC activity that researchers can consult for state-level CyberTip and case outcome figures [1].
2. Oregon legislative/DOJ materials cite explicit CyberTip counts for calendar year 2023
Oregon’s Legislative Fiscal Office document summarizing the Department of Justice’s ICAC funding request provides explicit CyberTip counts for calendar year 2023 — documenting 9,711 CyberTips received and noting that 9,661 (99.5%) are categorized in the cited breakdown — making it a usable state-level data point for 2023 CyberTip volume [2]. That document is not a stand‑alone “ICAC annual report” in the classic public report sense, but it is a state-produced legislative/DOJ accounting that supplies discrete CyberTip counts and policy context for budgeting decisions [2].
3. Other state-level sources in the provided set either do not publish comparable annual counts or focus on operations/tools
Several supplied items reference ICAC activity or capability at the state level without supplying annual CyberTip tallies or detailed case outcomes: a Georgia Bureau of Investigation announcement highlights deployment of Case Closed Software to triage CyberTips but does not present statewide CyberTip counts or final case outcomes in the excerpt provided [4]. The broader ICAC Task Force network and its national pages describe the program and training but do not substitute for individual state annual reports with enumerated CyberTip and disposition statistics in the snippets given [5].
4. National and platform-level shifts complicate year‑to‑year state comparisons
Federal and platform reporting in the dataset shows large fluctuations that can affect state-level volumes: NCMEC national CyberTipline totals reached a record 36.2 million reports in 2023, and platform changes (for example, Snap’s 2024 recalibration of reporting protocols) can reduce provider-generated CyberTips and thus change the downstream state workloads, meaning state counts can shift substantially due to provider policy changes rather than purely enforcement activity [6]. Separately, the OJJDP summary of ICAC program activity for FY2024 reports roughly 203,467 investigations and more than 12,600 arrests across the ICAC network, which is useful context but a program-wide figure rather than a state‑level annual report [3].
5. What the reporting gap means for researchers seeking state-by-state CyberTip and outcome data
From the supplied reporting, only Tennessee’s named 2024 ICAC Annual Report and Oregon’s legislative/DOJ budget document explicitly provide the kind of state-level CyberTip counts or references to counts for 2023–2024 [1] [2]. For other states, the available materials in this dataset either discuss tools, national aggregates, or program descriptions [4] [3] [5], so locating comparable state annual reports with both CyberTip counts and disposition (case outcome) breakdowns will require consulting individual state ICAC task force websites or contacting state ICAC coordinators directly — a limitation of the provided sources.