Which U.S. states had the highest reported forcible rape rates in 2023 and how much do reporting practices explain those rankings?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Alaska had the highest reported forcible rape rate in 2023—118.4 incidents per 100,000 residents—according to compiled FBI data as presented by Statista [1], and the Anchorage metropolitan area led U.S. metro areas that year [2]. Those headline rankings reflect both real differences and measurement artifacts: raw counts favor populous states like Texas and California, while rates per 100,000 spotlight small-population states where reporting practices, definitions, and local policing patterns can substantially influence rankings [3] [2].
1. What the official numbers say: states and metros that top the lists
Publicized 2023 figures derived from FBI reporting and republished by Statista show Alaska atop the state-by-state rape-rate chart at 118.4 per 100,000, while Texas and California recorded the largest absolute numbers of reported forcible rapes because of their population sizes [1] [3]; on a metropolitan scale, Anchorage was reported as the highest-rate metro area in 2023 [2]. These are reported offenses—what police agencies logged and sent into the FBI’s data stream—and the Statista visualizations explicitly use those FBI data as their source [3] [2].
2. Why rates and counts tell different stories
Counts and rates answer different questions: raw counts identify where the most incidents were reported in absolute terms (Texas and California lead), while rates per 100,000 normalize for population and expose places—often less populous or with concentrated problems—where victims per capita are highest (Alaska; Anchorage) [3] [2]. Analysts cite both measures because each can guide policy differently: resource allocation may follow counts, while prevention priorities may follow rates [3].
3. How reporting practices, definitions and data gaps shape rankings
The 2023 statistics rest on the FBI’s aggregated submissions, and what gets reported depends on local recording, whether agencies fully submit data, and the definitions used—issues flagged in the historical literature and by data compilers [2] [4]. Statista’s notes also warn of limited data availability for some states—Florida, for example, had constrained data in 2023—meaning comparative rankings can be distorted when a jurisdiction underreports or fails to supply complete files [1]. Changes over time in how rape is defined and counted (the UCR definition was revised beginning in the 2010s) further complicate direct comparisons across years and places [4].
4. Underreporting, access and local context: the invisible drivers
Crime statistics for sexual violence are widely acknowledged to undercount true prevalence because many survivors do not report to police, and reporting is influenced by local trust in law enforcement, availability of victim services, and cultural factors; experts emphasize survey-based measures and victimization studies to capture that hidden burden [2] [5]. Some research and summaries suggest rural areas sometimes show higher reported rates, which can result from both genuine differences and from differential access to services or reporting behaviors—an interpretive challenge flagged by state-level commentaries [6].
5. Balancing the explanations: how much is real versus reporting artifact?
The sources make clear that rankings reflect a mix: some portion of Alaska’s high rate likely represents real, localized prevalence as captured in police reports [1] [2], but the magnitude and ordering are also driven by reporting practices, definitional shifts, and incomplete submissions from certain states [1] [4]. Available reporting does not allow a precise decomposition or percentage that attributes variance to “true incidence” versus “reporting differences”; the public data and methodological notes instead mandate caution when inferring causation from rank alone [1] [2] [4].
6. What the data do and do not tell policy and the public
The FBI-derived, Statista-published rankings are useful signposts—identifying places that warrant deeper local study and resources—but they are not a definitive measure of lifetime risk or total victimization because surveys and other research consistently show far more sexual violence exists beyond what police records capture [2] [5]. Policymakers should treat high reported rates as alarms to investigate local practice and survivor support systems, not as final proof that a community is uniquely dangerous without corroborating evidence from victimization surveys and service-provider data [5] [4].