Which states reported declines in Medicaid fraud recoveries in 2024–2025 and were any recoveries reclassified or delayed?

Checked on December 12, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

The HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) reports that State Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs) collectively recovered $1.4 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2024, driven by $961 million in criminal recoveries and $407 million in civil recoveries; civil recoveries declined sharply year‑over‑year, falling by “more than half” from 2023 according to commentary [1] [2]. The OIG FY2024 MFCU snapshot lists recoveries by unit, but the provided sources do not supply a simple list of which states reported declines in recoveries in 2024–2025 or detailed, state‑by‑state notes about reclassifications or deliberate delays of recoveries [3] [2].

1. What the federal snapshot actually says about FY2024 recoveries

The HHS OIG’s FY2024 MFCU report frames the headline: 1,151 convictions and $1.4 billion in total MFCU recoveries, with criminal recoveries at a ten‑year high ($961 million) and civil recoveries totaling $407 million [1] [2]. Coverage across the available pieces emphasizes an aggregate national picture rather than a standardized state‑by‑state comparison showing increases or decreases over the 2023 baseline [3] [2].

2. Civil recoveries fell sharply — but explanations differ

Multiple analyses flag a steep decline in civil recoveries in FY2024: commentators note civil recoveries “fell by more than half from 2023” even as the number of civil settlements and judgments rose slightly [2]. That contrast matters: more actions but materially smaller monetary recoveries suggests case mix, lower‑dollar settlements, or timing effects rather than uniformly weaker enforcement in every state [2].

3. No comprehensive, state‑level decline table in the provided reporting

The primary OIG materials and law‑firm summaries present national totals and selective programmatic trends, but the search results do not include a single OIG table or summary that lists which individual states recorded declines in FY2024 recoveries versus FY2023 [3] [2]. Available sources do not mention a consolidated list of states with declines or the totals required to assert which states fell.

4. Reclassifications and timing: sources note trends but not systematic reclassification

Commentary and OIG materials discuss how recoveries are classified (criminal vs civil) and how case outcomes and timing affect annual totals, but the documents supplied do not report widespread, formal re‑classifications or agency admissions of deliberate delays in counting recoveries across states in 2024–2025 [3] [2]. Available sources do not mention a systematic reclassification or intentional postponement of recoveries at the nationwide MFCU level.

5. Why year‑to‑year volatility can be misleading

Experts and program integrity analysts emphasize that recoveries swing year to year because a handful of large settlements can dominate totals; a decline in civil recoveries could reflect fewer large qui‑tam or civil settlements in one year even as conviction and criminal recoveries rise [2]. That structural volatility means a state that pursued more cases may still show a lower dollar total if it lacked a blockbuster settlement in that fiscal year [2].

6. Related measures often conflated with fraud recoveries

Public reporting also highlights broader improper‑payment metrics (PERM): CMS reports a 2024 Medicaid improper‑payment rate of 5.09% ($31.1 billion) and stresses most improper payments result from insufficient documentation rather than proven fraud [4]. Analysts caution that improper‑payment rates are not equivalent to fraud recoveries; critics sometimes conflate paperwork‑driven error measures with deliberate fraud [4] [5].

7. The political and programmatic context matters

Federal and state policymakers have amplified rhetoric and new directives on rooting out Medicaid waste and fraud in 2025, including White House memoranda and proposed legislation to strengthen provider screening and analytics; those pressures can influence both the focus of MFCUs and how results are presented, and may drive investment in data tools that change detection and timing for recoveries [6] [7] [8]. Such policy shifts can create short‑term bumps or lulls in reported recoveries without reflecting a single factual decline in investigative effort [8] [6].

8. Conclusion — what we can and cannot conclude from these sources

From the supplied reporting, national MFCU recoveries were $1.4 billion in FY2024 with a marked fall in civil recovery dollars versus 2023, while criminal recoveries were strong [1] [2]. The documents provided do not identify which specific states reported declines in 2024–2025 nor do they document systematic reclassification or deliberate delays of recoveries at the state‑or‑national level; those claims are not found in current reporting [3] [2] [4]. For state‑by‑state confirmation, the underlying OIG state submissions or individual MFCU annual statements would need to be reviewed.

Want to dive deeper?
Which states had the largest increases in Medicaid fraud recoveries in 2024–2025 and why?
How do federal audits and CMS guidance affect state reporting of Medicaid recoveries each year?
Were any specific fraud recovery types (overpayments, provider audits, fraud lawsuits) reclassified between 2023–24 and 2024–25?
What impact do delayed recoveries or reclassifications have on state Medicaid budgets and federal match funding?
Have state-level fraud enforcement resources or staffing changes contributed to declines in Medicaid recoveries in 2024–2025?