Are there any publicly documented sworn statements by a first-hand victim of Epstein's that accuses Trump of wrongdoing?

1. What the new DOJ dump actually contains and what it does not: documents, tips and interview notes, not always sworn testimony

The Justice Department’s recent massive release of Epstein‑related files includes emails, flight logs, photos, investigator notes and summaries of interviews — material that reporters caution is a mixture of documentary records and unverified tips rather than court‑sworn declarations — and the DOJ has acknowledged redactions and removals where victim‑identifying material appeared ^{[3] [1] [4]}.

2. Official DOJ posture: no credible information linking Trump to criminal conduct in these files

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and DOJ statements accompanying the release have said DOJ review did not find credible information in the records that would merit further investigation into President Trump for sexual misconduct in connection with Epstein, and Blanche has been quoted saying Epstein’s communications “did not suggest President Trump had done anything criminal or had any inappropriate contact with any of his victims” ^{[2] [5]}.

3. References to Trump in the papers are numerous but largely unverified or third‑party

News organizations report thousands of files containing references to Trump — including emails Epstein sent about Trump, flight log entries, and investigator notes — but those references range from name mentions and unverified claims to handwritten interview summaries; the New York Times, NPR and PBS emphasize many Trump‑linked entries are salacious, unverified, or reflect tips rather than victim‑signed, sworn affidavits ^{[2] [3] [6]}.

4. Instances often cited as “accusations” are typically second‑hand or redacted investigator notes, not sworn first‑person accounts

Some items in the dump — such as a handwritten note summarizing a September 2019 interview that says a victim was driven to Mar‑a‑Lago and introduced to Trump — do not themselves allege improper conduct by Trump in the note and are labeled by reporting as interview summaries or third‑party recountings rather than sworn, first‑person allegations, and outlets point out that spreadsheets and other documents containing sensational claims were briefy online and then taken down as unverified ^{[7] [3] [8]}.

5. Public statements from known first‑hand victims and their legal representatives

Prominent Epstein survivors and lawyers who represent them have publicly stated that victims in their knowledge have not accused Trump of criminality; for example, Virginia Giuffre publicly denied allegations against Trump in her memoir and other venues, and Gloria Allred warned about victims’ privacy as documents were released but did not present sworn statements accusing Trump ^{[9] [1] [10]}.

6. Limits of the public record and remaining questions

While the public file releases include interview summaries and tips, they do not appear to include publicly released, notarized or court‑filed sworn statements from a first‑hand Epstein victim accusing Trump of wrongdoing; journalists and lawmakers have asked for FBI 302s and other investigatory interview records to be reviewed or released and those full materials — which could contain formal interview summaries — have not been publicly presented as sworn victim affidavits implicating Trump in criminal conduct ^{[8] [3]}.

Conclusion: based on the documents and reporting available in the public releases and the statements of DOJ and reporters examining those files, there is no publicly documented sworn statement by a first‑hand Epstein victim that accuses Donald Trump of criminal wrongdoing; the record contains references, unverified allegations, and investigative notes that mention Trump but not a released, sworn first‑person accusation ^{[2] [3] [7]}.