Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the tax implications for US citizens who hire undocumented workers?
Executive summary
U.S. tax rules treat pay for services the same regardless of a worker’s immigration status: wages paid to undocumented workers can be subject to income, Social Security, Medicare, and payroll withholding, and employers who hire undocumented workers face potential fines, penalties, and other legal exposure (IRS; Tax Adviser) [1] [2]. At the same time many undocumented workers still contribute substantial tax dollars—often via ITINs, borrowed or false SSNs, or payroll withholding—even though they are frequently excluded from benefits those taxes fund (Reuters; Bipartisan Policy Center; ITEP) [3] [4] [5].
1. The tax law baseline: undocumented status does not exempt someone from U.S. taxes
The IRS states plainly that “foreign workers who are illegal aliens (undocumented aliens) are subject to U.S. taxes in spite of their illegal status,” and that payments to such workers are subject to the same withholding and reporting rules that apply to other aliens, with special rules (for example, 30% NRA withholding on certain independent personal services) where applicable [1].
2. Payroll taxes and employer obligations: the same withholding rules apply
Employers generally must withhold Social Security and Medicare taxes on wages and are responsible for employer-side contributions; FUTA (unemployment) tax is an employer-only obligation (Tax Adviser) [2]. The practical effect: if an undocumented worker is employed “above the table” with a valid SSN or an ITIN used for reporting, the employer typically withholds and remits payroll taxes just as for any other employee [2] [4].
3. How undocumented workers end up paying taxes in practice
Many undocumented workers pay taxes by filing using an IRS Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN), by using a borrowed or false Social Security number that employers report on W‑2s, or by having payroll taxes withheld without filing—practices documented by Reuters and the Bipartisan Policy Center [3] [4]. Studies and IRS-advocate reports show ITIN filers are an identifiable tax-filing population and pay into the system, though they face administrative hurdles [6] [3].
4. Penalties, liabilities and enforcement risks for employers
Employers who knowingly hire unauthorized workers risk civil and criminal penalties, and may face fines and sanctions under immigration and employment law; courts and legal guidance also stress risk of liability where employers have “constructive knowledge” of unauthorized status (Nolo summary) [7]. The IRS page warns employers may be subject to “various fines, penalties, and sanctions” for hiring illegal aliens [1].
5. The “under-the-table” alternative: tax and revenue impacts
Economists warn that stricter enforcement or data-sharing (for example ICE‑IRS interactions) can push employers and workers toward cash, off‑the‑books arrangements, reducing tax collections because wages paid “under the table” generate no withholding or income‑tax filings (Budget Lab at Yale) [8]. The result is a tradeoff: enforcement that makes tax authorities’ access to information easier could reduce compliance if workers or employers respond by going informal [8].
6. Who benefits from taxes paid—and who doesn’t
Multiple sources note a mismatch: undocumented workers fund Social Security, Medicare, and state/local services through income, payroll and consumption taxes, yet often cannot access the benefits those taxes normally buy (ITEP; Thomson Reuters reporting) [5] [9]. Research cited by policy groups estimates large aggregate tax contributions by undocumented households, underscoring the fiscal stakes of whether they are employed formally (American Immigration Council; CMSNY; ITEP) [10] [11] [5].
7. Practical employer steps and legal pitfalls reported by practitioners
Legal guides urge employers to follow Form I‑9 verification strictly; employers may not ask for extra documents beyond what an employee offers, but they can be penalized for mismatches (Bipartisan Policy Center; Nolo) [4] [7]. Using the independent‑contractor label to avoid payroll obligations is risky: the government scrutinizes such classifications and can impose civil or criminal penalties if the arrangement is a sham [7].
8. Limits of available reporting and open questions
Available sources document tax rules, enforcement risks, and significant aggregate tax payments by undocumented workers, but they do not provide a single, definitive checklist of every penalty scale or an exhaustive, up‑to‑date schedule of fines employers might face; for that detailed, case‑specific guidance you would need to consult the current IRS, Department of Labor, and immigration‑enforcement guidance beyond these summaries (p1_s1; [7]; [12] not summarized in snippets) [1] [7].
Bottom line: hiring an undocumented worker does not eliminate ordinary tax obligations—in many cases it simply shifts legal risk. Employers who hire “above the table” typically must withhold and remit payroll taxes; those who pay cash or misclassify workers risk other legal exposure and can contribute to lost tax revenue if work goes informal [1] [2] [8].