Has Tommy Robinson been convicted for hate speech related to comments on Muslims?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Tommy Robinson (Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) has a long record of criminal convictions for offences such as fraud, assault and contempt of court, and platforms have repeatedly removed or banned his accounts for breaching hate-speech rules — but available sources do not show a criminal conviction specifically labelled “hate speech” for comments about Muslims; reporting notes bans by Facebook/YouTube/Twitter and long-running investigations, and some recent prosecutions have related to contempt or terrorism‑related procedural matters [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. A complex legal ledger, but not “hate speech” on the books
Robinson’s criminal history is well documented across outlets: convictions for assault, mortgage fraud, use of a false passport, contempt of court and other offences are repeatedly reported [5] [6]. He was jailed for republishing false claims about a Syrian refugee and sentenced to 18 months for contempt of court in 2024 [2] [7]. Multiple sources summarise this track record without recording a conviction that is explicitly for hate speech or malicious communications [3] [5].
2. Platform enforcement vs. criminal conviction — two different registers
Major tech platforms have treated Robinson’s output as breaching hate-speech rules: Facebook removed his page citing dehumanising language and “calls for violence targeted at Muslims” [1]. Twitter permanently banned him for “hateful conduct” in 2018, and YouTube, Facebook and Instagram have taken steps at various times to remove ads or accounts for guideline breaches [8] [1]. Those administrative sanctions are not the same as criminal convictions in UK courts; reporting distinguishes platform policy enforcement from criminal law outcomes [1] [8].
3. Investigations and public allegations exist, prosecutions have different focuses
Recent press indicates criminal investigations have been opened or considered — for example reporting that the Metropolitan Police investigated comments described as racist or hate speech in late 2025 — but coverage also notes that, “he has apparently never been convicted of hate speech or malicious communications” [3]. Separately, a 2025 trial and later proceedings focused on terrorism‑related allegations concerning refusal to give police phone access; Robinson was cleared of that terrorism offence in November 2025 [4] [9]. These developments show legal scrutiny but not a labelled criminal conviction for hate speech in available reporting [3] [4].
4. The public record: what reporting says and what it does not
News outlets and summaries emphasise convictions for contempt and other criminal offences and highlight platform removals for hate-related content [2] [1] [5]. Several pieces of analysis and opinion trace his public rhetoric about Muslims and note that social networks found his material violated hate policies [1] [10]. However, the sources supplied do not assert a UK court has convicted him under a statutory hate‑speech offence; in fact one source explicitly says he has “apparently never been convicted of hate speech or malicious communications” [3].
5. Competing narratives: free‑speech defence vs. critics’ framing
Robinson and supporters frame prosecutions and platform actions as censorship and attacks on free expression; academic and media critics present his behaviour as far‑right agitation that crosses into demeaning and dangerous rhetoric about Muslims and other groups [10] [1]. Major outlets reporting platform bans cited content described as “dehumanising” and “calls for violence targeted at Muslims,” while his defenders characterise enforcement as politically motivated. Both narratives appear in the supplied sources [1] [10].
6. Limitations and what remains unanswered in available reporting
Available sources do not include a UK criminal conviction explicitly for “hate speech” or “malicious communications” tied to comments about Muslims; they do report platform bans and investigations and several other criminal convictions of different kinds [3] [1] [2]. There may be ongoing investigations or later court rulings beyond these sources; such developments are not covered in the supplied reporting (not found in current reporting).
Conclusion: Based on the provided reporting, Robinson has been repeatedly penalised by social platforms for hate‑speech violations and has faced numerous criminal convictions for other offences, but the sources supplied do not document a criminal conviction in UK courts that is explicitly for hate speech related to comments on Muslims [1] [2] [3].